![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
BenFenner
I searched SE-R.net yesterday trying to find the info. I couldn't find it. I think I recall it being about 1.25 inches shorter than stock (when adjusted to about 80% shorter throw). It's been so long since I installed mine that I can't tell you how much shorter it is. Comparing it to the stock SE-R I drove maybe 6 months ago it seems to be about 1.5 or so inches shorter than stock. Does the shift boot you're trying to get not sag down a bit into the center console? Are you trying to avoid having it sag down any at all? The stock shift boot sags a bit, and with my pacesetter the stock shift boot sags enough so that I can put my hand down there and feel the chassis. It looks normal though. Personally I prefer it to sag down and then come back up. Otherwise it looks like a silly upside down ice cream cone or something.
If you try to get it too tight, then you might have issues with sag in some gears and tugging in others. I just don't see what you're trying to accomplish? You want it to look stock? Just get a shift boot 1 inch shorter and you should be fine. Or stock length is pretty okay too. Edit: Oh you will have it at it's shortest setting? Then maybe 1.5 inches shorter than stock might be better. You could go as much as 2 inches shorter and it will work fine, but you might get a bit of the ice cream cone look going on.
Sorry I don't have any better info.
Ya, I was going for a stockish look/function with regards to the boot.
Something like this is fine:
So it sounds like -1" from stock is the ticket. I was just trying to avoid having to cut it, or worse, come up too short.
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
eggman
Pacesetter damn close to the same as stock check out this pics.If the pace setter is shorter,its not by much. I would guess around 1 inch.
.
.
.
After comparing them,I decided that moving the stock ball up is pretty much the same for and you cant beat the price.
I have had both and blindfolded,I would think you would have a hard time telling the difference between them.
Perfect picture...pretty much sums it up....thanks Jay!
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
93specv
I have the pacesetter sts...it's actually not all that shorter in length from oem, it's the point of leverage that makes the throw shorter. It is adjustable too. I originally set it to the shortest throw only to find it hit the crossmember making it near impossible to shift reverse and 5th. I backed it off just enough to clear. I love it! Nothing to compare to but I know a "shorter" shifter does nothing. It's the point of leverage that needs to be shorter. With an adjustable, that point can be maximized! And if a "shorter" shifter is what you want than just saw it down, lol!
Excellent info. The part about hitting the crossmember is most useful. I'll have to pay attention to that when I install it. Thanks.
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
classicaddict
i have nothing to add to this thread but that the pace setter was the best shifter i ever had the pleasure of owning............someone should make a replica of it and start selling them again! all the other shifters made atm are wayyyyyyyy to $$ and way to short in length.
Good to hear...