Originally Posted by
BenFennerThe vibrations are there during idle and that's about it. Not really during acceleration.
Yep.
Originally Posted by
BenFennerThe vibrations are harsh, and make things rattle that never rattled before. It is one of the few modifications that really changes the character of a car from a daily driver to a race car. It's not recommended for the faint at heart.
Disagreed to some degree.
"Harsh" is subjective. I don't find them overtly harsh. Hell, I can barely remember stock.
I also like the handling benefits. The motor/tranny does not move nearly as much when hitting high-g curves. Car seems more solid, suspension works even better.
Porsche has "active motor mounts" that stiffen up when under load. There is a reason for that. More precise handling due to the reduced movement of the drivetrain.
Originally Posted by
BenFennerAlso, only doing the rear mount will accelerate the destruction of the front OEM mount.
Yep.
Originally Posted by
BenFennerI have all poly on my street car and I wouldn't do it if I didn't need them because of the torque.
I have considered going with three (3) poly mounts, and going back to the "big rubber fluid-filled" Nissan one. Ala Dave Coleman waaaaay back in SCC. You utilized poly in the mounts that resist the torque, use the Nissan "big rubber fluid-filled" one that transmits the majority of the vibration to the cabin.
But then again, I don't mind the vibration much and the Nissan "fluid-filled" mount is damn expensive to quell a bit of vibration.