![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
BenFennerThe vibrations are there during idle and that's about it. Not really during acceleration.
Yep.
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
BenFennerThe vibrations are harsh, and make things rattle that never rattled before. It is one of the few modifications that really changes the character of a car from a daily driver to a race car. It's not recommended for the faint at heart.
Disagreed to some degree.
"Harsh" is subjective. I don't find them overtly harsh. Hell, I can barely remember stock.
I also like the handling benefits. The motor/tranny does not move nearly as much when hitting high-g curves. Car seems more solid, suspension works even better.
Porsche has "active motor mounts" that stiffen up when under load. There is a reason for that. More precise handling due to the reduced movement of the drivetrain.
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
BenFennerAlso, only doing the rear mount will accelerate the destruction of the front OEM mount.
Yep.
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
BenFennerI have all poly on my street car and I wouldn't do it if I didn't need them because of the torque.
I have considered going with three (3) poly mounts, and going back to the "big rubber fluid-filled" Nissan one. Ala Dave Coleman waaaaay back in SCC. You utilized poly in the mounts that resist the torque, use the Nissan "big rubber fluid-filled" one that transmits the majority of the vibration to the cabin.
But then again, I don't mind the vibration much and the Nissan "fluid-filled" mount is damn expensive to quell a bit of vibration.