Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: ATI Super Damper (racing crank pulley) for Nissan SR20 FWD Engines

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 31-40 of 72
2010-10-31 00:15:47
#31
Originally Posted by ashtonsser
Ive been using aluminum UR pullies since 2003 with never any issues with main bearing failures. Every single sr20 motor ive pulled apart even my original 240k mile motor that had rod knock, the mains were in perfect condition. Not even hardly a trace of wear. And that motor had a set of UR pullies on it with a JUN ultralightweight flywheel for 5 years before i bought the car.

Ive always used them and reved motors both mine and buddies cars ive done to 8-9k with zero issues.

Im reving my current motor, same one that has 11k miles on it already of 8k rpm rev limiter banging abuse and a couple times saw well over 11k after sheering my 3rd and 4th gear right at redline 20psi of boost full throttle. Never an issue. Buddies ve has a Greg V pulley on it and sees 9k all the time as well. Never an issue.

i think for motors reving out to maybe 10k should probably consider running the ATI pulley but not for less revs than that.


These issues tend to show up on road race engines more than drag cars. Prolonged (like 20 minutes) high rpm use and heavy cornering loads seems to be the recipe.
2010-10-31 03:51:20
#32
Originally Posted by ashtonsser
Ive been using aluminum UR pullies since 2003 with never any issues with main bearing failures.
As expected. Undamped torsional harmonics don't cause main bearing wear. Main cause for that is unbalanced rotating assembly and overtightened accessory belts.
2010-10-31 16:18:35
#33
Originally Posted by Teal97
fwiw, when mulling over what my VE motor was going to end up as....and seeing the $$ i'd be sinking in to it.....my gspec crank pulley got sold. i figured a few hp wasn't worth the risk. the oem crank pulley is now in place


This was my thoughts too.
There was another thread about this awhile ago.
I decided I would rather give up a HP or two for longevity,since the VE has a 4CW crank..
2010-10-31 20:57:58
#34
Originally Posted by Benito
Does ATI actually stock these? I remember a few years back I helped veilside180sx test fit one he got from Daxx for a group buy but iirc it fell apart and ATI axed the project.


Forum sponsor mazworx has them for sale.
I prefer the street version btw.
Last edited by Kleensleeper on 2012-02-02 at 04-50-34.
2012-01-31 23:30:31
#35
Bump.

Despite the fact that an ATI Super Damper is not a necessity on a VE engine, I would still be interested in hearing if anybody on this forum has them on their VE and their impressions on how it changed the feel of the engine. More importantly at high RPM's and also any dyno numers before and after. I understand this is not a power adder per say but a smoother running crank at high RPM's would seem to increase the engine's ability to perform within it's own limitations, if ever so slightly.

At $500+ for an ATI damper and 300-400 for others, it seems that most could benefit from just buying a new OEM/stock replacement VE crank pulley. I believe they go for $175-200ish depending? I gather that a 12-14 yr. old crank pulley would not be as successful at dampening crankshaft waves/vibrations as a brand new one would. I guess it all depends and the abuse the 'old' crank pulley has seen. I have seen some that look bad, with dings, dents and possibly even warped?

Anybody have any NEW thoughts on these two points?


I was going to post links from other threads about dampening crank vibrations vs undampened solid pulleys but that is not why I bumped this. The debate has been had thousands of times on many different forums. I am more looking for user feedback on the VE's. Don't really hear much if anything at all.
2012-02-01 05:14:06
#36
I plan to rev my build to 10k, I was reving my DE to 9 on occasion with an aluminum pulley and had no issues at all. On this build im using a stock VE pulley just for the extra harmonics dampening.

I know the B series guys usually always chose to run an ATI or Fluidamper pulley because they have issues shattering oil pump gears. However I will say this. I believe and from what Ive read it has to do with alignment of the oil pump. If you have it even slightly off center it can cause issues with the pump shattering. I believe the honda oil pumps dont have any alignment dowel pins like our pumps do as well. So that could be the issues as im sure there is some movement that can happen and off centering can occur when installing the pump.

I havent seen any issues with ours with people breaking oil pumps. I mean cory was reving his all the way to right at 10k with his 2.3 and i believe 9500 with the 2.4 stroker. I dont know what pulley he was using though.

I think ill be fine with the stock VE pulley. I definitely dont want to use the aluminum pulley at that rpm though.
2012-02-01 05:17:33
#37
overpriced...makes people say "wow, he spent too much on that."
2012-02-01 16:48:41
#38
Originally Posted by nsusammyeb
overpriced...makes people say "wow, he spent too much on that."


Or, they say, "That guy was smart enough to spend a fraction of the $15k he spend prepping the race engine he built to protect it."

If I ever go with different pullies, I'll be using one of the ATIs.
2012-02-02 00:02:20
#39
$500 for a pulley...c'mon. Absolutely ridiculous. Pay to play is an understatement when it costs as much as a set of pistons or rods.
2012-02-02 04:22:38
#40
Originally Posted by nsusammyeb
$500 for a pulley...c'mon. Absolutely ridiculous. Pay to play is an understatement when it costs as much as a set of pistons or rods.


I think the trade off and peace of mind makes it well worth it.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top