![](/images/threads/icons/0.png)
Here are some pics of the pacesetter,stock and B&M for comparo..
![](http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a90/jj1971/Track%20SE-R/shortshifters/shifters003.jpg)
![](http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a90/jj1971/Track%20SE-R/shortshifters/shifters002.jpg)
As you can see the adjustable pacesetter actually puts the shifter slightly closer to you than the B&M.
Also,the Pacesetter uses the stock pivot assembly,so it is less prone to rattling.
The B&M is sturdy as Fawk,but the metal to metal pivot has been subject of rattling complaints after they get older.
Just my .02
They both shift nicely,but yeah moving the stock ball is the best bang for the buk...or no buck
![](http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a90/jj1971/Track%20SE-R/shortshifters/shifters003.jpg)
![](http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a90/jj1971/Track%20SE-R/shortshifters/shifters002.jpg)
As you can see the adjustable pacesetter actually puts the shifter slightly closer to you than the B&M.
Also,the Pacesetter uses the stock pivot assembly,so it is less prone to rattling.
The B&M is sturdy as Fawk,but the metal to metal pivot has been subject of rattling complaints after they get older.
Just my .02
They both shift nicely,but yeah moving the stock ball is the best bang for the buk...or no buck
![:D](images/emoji/happy/big_grin.gif)