Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Toyota FT-86 / Subaru BRZ: Japanese (not Siamese) Twins

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 511-520 of 593
2012-04-04 15:04:17
#511
Originally Posted by Cliff
Too much low. Should be a tad bit higher imo.


It has at least 0.030" of suspension travel left....
2012-04-04 15:08:48
#512
Originally Posted by jdmb14sx
this looks much better ,even tho i would have chose diff wheels,im really liking the body lines of this car


that looks good.

Stratton.
2012-04-04 15:43:14
#513
i may buy one of these new when my G35 is paid off.. i am paying 15 days early and $52 extra per month, so my 4 year loan will be shortened considerably.. the Scion version has super-car lines..
2012-04-04 15:58:40
#514










i for sure will have to get one. im looking at maybe end of next year.
Last edited by LIUSPEED on 2012-04-04 at 16-04-29.
2012-04-04 16:15:58
#515
Originally Posted by wnwright
Same goes with stock tires being shared with Prius.

Front and rear share parts with 2 different gens of old Imprezas IIRC. I could go next door and ask, but the point is that they cut costs on suspension design. Right or wrong.



Thanks you wnwright for spicing this topic up with some intelligent discussion

Anyways, question wnwright; if the boxer based engine cars used double wishbone/independent setups up front, would you not have to raise the engine up by a fairly substantial amount in order to accommodate such a setup?? And if so, would this not devoid the point of the boxer setup in the first place?? (honest questions)

If so, I personally would say "wrong" just from the simple fact of simplicity and price standpoint.

Now, the tires being the same as the Prius.............No comment
2012-04-04 16:25:40
#516
You mean like this boxer engine setup with double wishbone suspension?

http://priuschat.com/forums/attachments/freds-house-pancakes/14461d1241232114-game-called-cars-porsche_917_kurz_cutaway_by_shin_yoshikawa.78213411_std.jpg

Or this one?

http://cdn-8.motorsport.com/static/img/mgl/100000/190000/191000/191700/191728/s1_1.jpg


But to get to the point. No, the engine doesn't have to raise up at all for a double wishbone setup. You can either make sure the engine is far back enough, or widen the track of the vehicle, or make the engine a stressed member for packaging, etc.
Last edited by BenFenner on 2012-04-04 at 16-31-02.
2012-04-04 16:38:48
#517
Originally Posted by Boostlee
Thanks you wnwright for spicing this topic up with some intelligent discussion


I try to avoid that at all times.

Not trying to knock the car at all, but there isn't anything special to this car. They took a base model Impreza and reskinned it IMO. People can pick that statement apart all they want, but that is what you are buying. It will be a great car and will handle great. It is a proven design and that along with cost is why they did what they did. IMO strut based suspension cars are handicapped, but AWD overcomes a lot of that IMO.
2012-04-04 16:43:53
#518
To be fair, I personally think the engine relocation (and associated RWD transmission) qualifies this for a good bit more than just an Imprezza re-skin.
2012-04-04 16:48:04
#519
yeah an imprezza thats rwd.

lol.

stratton.
2012-04-04 17:29:00
#520
Originally Posted by STRATTON
yeah an imprezza thats rwd.

lol.

stratton.


Or a Toyota that stole the motor from Subaru. I mean, it DOES have Yamaha heads, and WE all know that heads make the motor more than just slugs in the bottom end of aluminum.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top