Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Precision SC6162??? (.63 back housing)

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 1-10 of 31
2008-06-06 17:47:56
#1
Precision SC6162??? (.63 back housing)
Just wondering if anyone has experience with this turbo? I am somewhat interested in this turbo. I would go with a .63 back housing to avoid lag.

My number one contender is the GT3071r but, the SC6162 has caught my eye.


Anyone have first hand experience with one?
2008-06-06 17:52:29
#2
I have road in a few gt3071r powered s2000's and I have to say I like this turbo ....I heard precsion has a new turbo with billet wheels comming out and they are supposed to spool real fast and folow high amounts ...
2008-06-06 17:55:11
#3
I drove Manny's (SE-Rawkus) VE-T powered SE-R a bunch of time and he has a SC61 but, I think he had the .82 back housing.

I am just curious what other have to say about this turbo. Manny's car was a bit to laggy for me. I am just wondering if anyone has used the .63 back housing.
2008-06-06 18:01:11
#4
WICKED R's SC61 was .63 turbine
2008-06-06 18:24:04
#5
i have the sc6176e. p trim wheel with .63 back, the highest boost i have ran so far is 14psi, i would say it isnt to laggy but the lag is there, my buddy has the sc6152e on his mr2 he says it is to laggy for him he has the .63back
2008-06-06 18:34:53
#6
I have somthiing in between those two turbos you listed ...I have a gt3076r with a .82 gt vband housing it should spool faster then th sc61 and make more power then the gt3071r
2008-06-06 18:49:43
#7
Rob,

I can't find my 15 psi run file, but here is the .63, SC6152E @ 10psi with stock cams, I personally don't think its that laggy.

2008-06-06 18:53:50
#8
Originally Posted by SE-Rican
I drove Manny's (SE-Rawkus) VE-T powered SE-R a bunch of time and he has a SC61 but, I think he had the .82 back housing.

I am just curious what other have to say about this turbo. Manny's car was a bit to laggy for me. I am just wondering if anyone has used the .63 back housing.


I'm pretty sure he had the .63 as well, based on the Precision part number he had posted.
2008-06-06 19:27:56
#9
Thanks for the input guys.
2008-06-06 19:33:23
#10
Nissan crazy, i thought the gt3076r flow more than the gt3071? I think your misinformed about that.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top