Originally Posted by
ashtonsser Im very well aware of who Rockwood is for one.
Second, read the new thread, not the old. The old thread was missing a lot of information.
I read the exact thread you linked. The info was useful for helping me make a decision.
Originally Posted by
ashtonsser On the p10 you dont have to cut any crossmember. You might have to notch the lip off the subframe/k-member but thats it.
Which wrench do you use to notch the subframe?
Originally Posted by
ashtonsser Secondly on the clutch, no more drilling of the firewall and modifying the pedal. 4th gen altima pedal bolts right in with the slight notching of the ridge on the engine bay side of the firewall. Again the new thread i linked you to explains everything in specific detail.
More notching? I thought this was bolt on? Is there a notching bolt I can buy from a hardware store?
Originally Posted by
ashtonsser Its no more of a bolt in affair than doing a proper p11 transmission with a hydraulic conversion. Which in my opinion is the best way to run one vs converting it to cable. Pedal feel and everything is so much better with the hydro.
Pedal feel is fine with a cable. It's lighter than going with a hydro setup. It's also easier. There's no reservoir and fluid to worry about. I can also adjust the engagement point quite easily.
The best part about staying cable? Not spending money on an unnecessary mod. With the JWT clutch's lighter than stock effort, I highly doubt we'll ever break a cable unless we seriously neglect it.
Originally Posted by
ashtonsser Again please read through the new thread Rockwood. It will enlighten you a bit I guarantee it.
I did. It said I needed to notch the subframe. It also said swapping in this transmission was going to mean spending thousands more on a pile of parts needed for the swap. No thanks.
Originally Posted by
ashtonsser Lastly, Redline shockproof is shit oil anyways. Matter fact its the 3rd oil i used on the gearstack that only lasted again about a month before disentegrating 3rd gear. It doenst lubricate the gears properly due to its viscosity and small oiling passages in the b13 trans. The 85w140 was NIGHT and DAY difference between all the other oils. Ask anyone thats used it. I dont talk out my ass on this.
This makes zero sense. Heavy shockproof is 75W90. Why would a lower viscosity oil have trouble flowing through oiling passages that 140w can?
It lasted you a month before you blew up 3rd. Mine has lasted with it for years, thousands of miles of almost 400lb-ft at the wheels. Oh yeah, and I road raced it: 60+ shifts into/out of third gear per session and WOT for 20-30 minutes straight. Worked fine for me. Anecdotal evidence is not gospel.
Originally Posted by
ashtonsser Yes we know the b13 trans is garbage but you can make it last a hell of a alot longer with something as simple as using the Valvoline oil. Again its proven. Ive converted many people on here to it and all of them absolutely love it. I think only one has broken a trans with it but it lasted a hell of a lot longer than the others did. Mine never broke with it and that was with 460whp daily on it and always tortured. There is no explaining how it lasted so long other than the gear oil swap.
How many clutch drops at 90mph with the equivalent of a 100lb flywheel did you do? That's what hopping curbing in 3rd at WOT is, since you're not only spinning the flywheel and clutch cover, you're also spinning up the countershaft, diff, axles, brakes, wheels and tires. How many times have you either been flooring the car, or max braking, with almost no air entering the front of the car because you're feet away from the car in front of you, making the diff earn it's keep over a dozen corners in less than 2 minutes, for 40 minutes straight? Trying to stay with the 32V in a racecar was a bad move on my part. I didn't want to keep repeating it when fixing the 32V would cost almost as much as it did for me to buy this P11 trans.
Originally Posted by
ashtonsser Id still recommend running it in this new trans. Please give it a shot. If your using shockproof I highly recommend draining that crap. Not good for our transmissions and again like I mentioned before, using shockproof is old school information. We are talking something that was used back in the late 90's as a bandaid to the trans. Well now there's a cast so to speak with using a better heavy weight oil.
I'm sorry, but I'm leery of a regular dinosaur oil trying to hold up to 300*F case temps, mega-shear, etc. Redline Shockproof has been proven with over a dozen road racing SE-Rs. It's still used by nearly every front-running SE-R out there.
BTW, it's ironic that Valvoline, which is an old-school dinosaur-based GL-5 gear oil and decidedly not friendly for synchro transmissions, is recommended because it's "new", but a true synthetic with advanced chemistry isn't because it's "old" and "bad for the transmission."
Either way, the reasons I cited for not using a 51H have still yet to be struck down:
1. Grinding, clearancing, etc, of stressed parts of the chassis is not bolt on.
2. The 51H swap, according to your thread, will cost almost $2500 MORE than our 70A swap.
3. The 51H is considerably heavier.
4. I hate HLSD for road racing.
5. Cable-shifters suck
6. I don't need a 0.630:1 gear, so why carry it around?
If you're drag racing on huge power, I agree the 51H is the better choice. However, for a
T25 on
STOCK BOOST it would've not only added unwanted weight to the nose of the car (the worst spot possible), it would've been unnecessary and stuck us with a subpar diff.
In the end, this article was about how to mod a 70A trans, and why we felt it was a better decision FOR US than the 51H.
Originally Posted by
ashtonsser Oh and 51H shifts like shit on a stick? LMAO. Maybe an early one with syncro issues. 04+, Id say way smoother shift than even a b13/b14 trans. Positive feel, smooth engagement even under no lift shift situations, again something I personally have done and experienced.
Maybe your drive with a 6 speed was a different experience than mine but yeah I wouldn't say that it shifts like shit.
Dude, you must be deluding yourself. How is a transmission that's shifted by a bunch of sloppy cables snaked around multiple bends actuated by a lever housed in a plastic case going to be better than solid linkage?
I'm not the only one that feels this way:
Dodge Neon vs. VW Jetta, Nissan Sentra, Subaru Impreza, Mazda Protegé Comparison Tests - Page 3 - Car and Driver
And synchros don't solve this, otherwise the 32V would shift the same, which it doesn't.
But yeah, thanks for half-reading my article, then shitting all over it I guess. Since I obviously need the biggest transmission that'll fit, and I need to be innovative or people will call me old school, I'm going to swap in a 4000 series Allison.