Thread: Boosted Roller Rockers

I call BS on that.

Low port is a drop in mani.



You can see 200wtq in that graph. When I went to VET cams it dropped to 180wtq (even smaller small lobe). Had to increase timing a good bit to get it up to 200wtq, but having trouble (knock limited) to getting it above 200wtq with VET cams. 20VE cams I believe the max TQ I got was 220. This is all at 7-8psi btw.

Well I can believe that with VET cams.. they suck donkey. But your issue isn't have a VE. With a VE you should get a much broader power band.

I am putting A RR motor in my 92 SER have any of you done this if so, what all is needed or is it a plain and easy??


Thanks,

sorry if im posting in the wrong are

I would say I do have a broader powerband, but I wanted MPG's too (more efficient engine, smaller lobes for DDing, etc.) Since I haven't really seen that I'm thinking going back to RR might be the only way.

I'm going to laugh if you dont get any better mpg's and laugh harder if you get worse mpgs, i'll prob piss my self from laughin if you make less power.

RR is for men only

Honestly if If I do it wont matter to me, because I'll have $2k cash in my pocket from getting rid of VE stuff.

MPG's should stay same or get better. Boost usually makes them better (and it did when I went from NA VE to boosted VE). Power should be about same on a GTiR manifold and 20VE cams.

2k in ve parts? i hope thats not including that engine you've molestered. lol.

VEs have low torque? Wtf, Vadim???