I'm sorry, I must not be taking this in fully.
Originally Posted by
BenFenner I talked to them about it in their thread. The radius on their bend is 2.25" on the 2.25" diameter pipe. That is exactly what you'd get from a metal doughnut. And the bend really does have to be that tight. They are trying to clear the A/C unit. So pie cuts or an expensive cast piece is the only right way to do it..
If the mandrel doughnut achieves the same CLR and bend radius, then why would the only "right way" to do it be with a pie cut or expensive cast piece?
Going back to my point on faster production time and a cleaner appearance. I feel that with the mandrel doughnut it would be much less fab time involved with a fraction of the welding time. As long as you have some type of belt sander to obtain the angles you want on the flanges.
Versus this extravagant piece of work
I personally like the look of the mandrel bent doughnut better than turbofx's final product. Now we all know that functionality is the main deciding factor for most of us. But if you are saying that both methods achieve the same functionality, I see an obvious choice....
Originally Posted by
BenFenner As for the price/performance. 10% WHP gain for going with a divorced wategate seems completely reasonable for $300.
And this last portion of this post keeps changing on me
It went from 40 WHP to being unknown. Now to 10% whp gain.
But seriously, has there been a dyno yet?
-Seth