Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Think I went with too big of a turbo...

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 501-510 of 710
2011-09-06 02:39:51
#501
Originally Posted by THE_FUGITIVE
aye pTen behave , what turbo you gonna use?


I haven't got that far yet, I have a few turbos laying around that i could use during break in, (few gtir T28s, GT2560R, t25's) But of course ill get something bigger.

Im not rushing things, I only just got hold of a very VERY cheap VE head, so right now im tearing down the DET bottom end for rebuild
2011-09-06 02:47:58
#502
I made 288whp at 13psi on my ve with a t25 and a 2 1/2 exhaust. Just saying.
2011-09-06 02:50:48
#503
T25, is far too small for what i want - I would want power throughout the rev-range.

I have had my fun with T25/t28's with my AWD Det - Time to play with other things.
2011-09-06 06:06:45
#504
Originally Posted by totaled200ser
Coheed- I think Vadim should go with the vet cams at this point, only because it seems like more work than I thought for him to run the gti-r setup. It will be easier than building a new manifold and much more cost effective. It will also help with spool time (as you know). I still think that he could get what he wants out of this setup with tuning but either way the vet cams would still net huge gains across the board, make power earlier and require a much simpler tune. I still would like to see someone like Jamie(sr20gtir) tune his setup just as it sits and see where it is at. Then drop in the cams if he still isn't happy with the results. Since it is going to cost money either way and he would also need to spend money on dyno time and tuning, it probably won't happen. I still recommend tuning the car on a dyno no matter what, with either cams. I wouldn't consider getting a tubular manifold for what his goals are. Like I and everyone else has said, he will notice nice gains with the tubular but I still do not think that it is necessary. Since he is looking for a more responsive setup, the vet cams will help alot. I suspect that more timing down low while tuning and monitoring everything on a dyno would make the current setup very nice and more responsive. The vet cams certainly won't hurt anything and will help with spool time. Even with the stock ve bottom end, you can run 14lbs+ all day long safely but once again I wouldn't do that unless you strap the car down and really dyno tune it. What are you revving to now V?
Drew


VET cams where/are still on the table. They are just hard to come by. But it seems like VE would still not appreciate the restrictive log. I can understand on why too. With such a good flowing head, the exhaust manifold is the killer. Thus I think even with VET cams I will see some heat/timing issues.

I'm curious on what it makes now too, and how far I could get it power wise, but I honestly don't even want to bother wasting the time on it anymore. I'm going to start buying supplies for building my manifold.

Protech makes a manifold like this and SE-Rawkus made over 500whp on his. Problem is it requires some modification to the downpipe still, and the price is a little out of my price range (~$850 shipped).




Once I get my mig I will build everything from scratch, including the downpipe and lead pipe. Then sell the current manifold and try to get some money back .

Originally Posted by Coheed
yeah, that is where the crossroads lie. Go tubular, or just get cams. Nissan designed those VET cams to work well with a small turbo, and that is the cheapest way to go. Since I have been down both roads, this is what I recommend.

Going tubular does limit room in the engine bay by quite a bit.


The VET exhaust manifold flows better then even the GTi-R one right? Cams would definitely help out by reducing reversion, but contaminated flow would still be a concern.

Originally Posted by THE_FUGITIVE
still the VET has a cast style mani that separates it till the collector , now my buddies 4WD GTIR with DET ,Log and 62mm turbo was Pulling strongggg on 20psi, they then decided to go VE.

VADIM I swear our setup felt laggy and horrible , my buddies wanted to kill me because the VE Head felt worst than the DET Head lol , they ignored me at first when i told them about the log and .63 a/r only because of the trouble to go tubular. Kept mentioning it as we always pressed gas and the VVL and felt worst than my cousins n/a VE.

At 23psi the Turbo kicked the bucket and they had no choice now to go Tubular and a Similar Turbo with .86a/r.

at 15 psi it almost felt like the DET on 20PSI , Crazy , at 21 psi , HOLY.....mother f..k..r, started seeing boost at 4000 , when VVL kicked in at 5000 , wow you couldnt lean forward , all these videos when guys FWD starts roasting tyres , I giggle and wish the ones who hasnt, really FEEL how a VVL Turbo 4WD Reacts when it kicks in, To me a VVL T3 Turboed without a Tubular is not a Turboed VVL lol.

theres around 3 other VVL's with T3 Turbo's I know off and they work like sheitttt, all of them has GTIR mani's with a T3 Adapter, I had a serious talk with one of them and he is doing Tubular , It will finish any day, He had a GTIR mani and T28 and it smoked 1st , 2nd, 3rd , he then did a rebuild with Haltech GT35R , DET Pistons , Rods but used a GTIR Manifold , when 2nd gear went it now it bugged , went out of vvl , sound lazy, it sucked ,

he wil be finished soon. Tubular or GTIR mani w/ Turbo or UTFR !!!

PS: Coheed your advice hits the nail on the head everytime.


That's the kind of car response I'm looking for. Neck hurting torque, but knowing our transmissions and axles I would have to keep the torque down.

Thanks for the input on the GTiR manifolds, sounds like they might be an upgrade, but ultimately still don't flow well enough.

Originally Posted by P10FTW
I made 288whp at 13psi on my ve with a t25 and a 2 1/2 exhaust. Just saying.


Jeeez, I thought T25's topped out a lot earlier?
2011-09-06 13:04:43
#505
Originally Posted by Vadim



Jeeez, I thought T25's topped out a lot earlier?
Nope, Damian made 327whp on a t25 on his VE-T. Also I forgot who was the other forum member that made over 300whp on his t25 and ran mid 12's on his DE-T T25, screename was blkse-r or something like that. Lance also made over 300whp and over 300ft lbs of torque on his DET with a t25.
2011-09-06 14:27:48
#506
Dang, the most anyone here has made is about 280whp with a GT2560r. It was maxxed. But they are supposed to be good around 300.

I do agree that running a log and VET cams does limit the VVL a bit. Having just the intake kick on isn't as fun as having both cams switching and all hell breaking loose. So it doesn't make the best use of the head flow.

And even now, I am tubular with 1.6L cams, I still don't feel like the VVL is used to its full potential. Still could use better exhaust flow. Top end power is still pretty limited and within 30whp of my VET/Log setup. And I still feel like there is more left on the table with just getting the parts to work together.

I think the 2.0 cams would work better for what the setup has now, but on low boost the 1.6 cams perform better. Once I go over 20psi, the 2.0 cams seemed to work better. And I think this all comes down to flow, and overlap. The 1.6 cams work better on low boost, when backpressure is relatively low. But once the backpressure spikes with boost, it looses the top end quite a bit.

I have always wondered how a large cam would work with a small-ish turbo with a big exhaust housing. Like my GT30 with a 1.06 open housing. I think that it would perform really well on high boost, but noone dares try it. With such a free-flowing cam, free-flowing turbine housing, and small turbo, you would think that it would still have to spool faster than a .63 GT35r. Less rotational inertia. But when it hits, it is going to hit really hard, really fast.
2011-09-06 17:34:24
#507
In that case I might go with SR16VE cams after I get a manifold then too. I feel like they might be a little slow NA wise, but boost would help them feel better.


Originally Posted by P10FTW
Nope, Damian made 327whp on a t25 on his VE-T. Also I forgot who was the other forum member that made over 300whp on his t25 and ran mid 12's on his DE-T T25, screename was blkse-r or something like that. Lance also made over 300whp and over 300ft lbs of torque on his DET with a t25.


That's some very impressive numbers. Regular journaled bearing T25's?
2011-09-06 17:48:47
#508
Yeah. Blkse-r clicked off a 12.1 quarter mile pass on dr's. It's on the old forum.
2011-09-06 17:56:44
#509
Those numbers would be understandable on a +t especially on a ve+t. VE's make good numbers without the turbo haha.

300hp on a DET is a bit hard to believe tho. I ran 13-15psi on my T25 on my AWD det and there was no way i was even near that. (Nismo injectors, cams n62)

I do have access to some turbos that have 1.06 a/r - Maybe i should see if i can get my hands on a cheap one and give it a try.
2011-09-06 22:14:47
#510
Originally Posted by pTen
Those numbers would be understandable on a +t especially on a ve+t. VE's make good numbers without the turbo haha.

300hp on a DET is a bit hard to believe tho. I ran 13-15psi on my T25 on my AWD det and there was no way i was even near that. (Nismo injectors, cams n62)

I do have access to some turbos that have 1.06 a/r - Maybe i should see if i can get my hands on a cheap one and give it a try.


AWD will obviously give you way less horses.

I am striving for 325-350 on my T28 setup. It's going to be maxxed out, but I hope I can hit it
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top