Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Think I went with too big of a turbo...

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 351-360 of 710
2011-08-22 02:48:28
#351
Pm me or call me Vadim. I'll be glad to speak.

I'm done posting on the forum.
2011-08-22 02:57:04
#352
Originally Posted by ashtonsser
Because there is a magical 50whp in a tune over someone who knows fairly well how to tune. lol obviously.


This is one main reason why.

When I said don't have it in me, I was not referring to you or your bet.

That's all.
2011-08-22 03:01:15
#353
Originally Posted by ashtonsser
Because there is a magical 50whp in a tune over someone who knows fairly well how to tune. lol obviously.


Aston and Coheed, instead of telling to change parts,why can't you guys just advise him to take the car to the Dyno?
Over the years I have ran into multiple cars that all seem well but they just don't perform, on the Dyno we have discovered faulty knock sensors bad air flow meters, issues with timing,fuel pressure drops on basically new walboro pumPs and regulators, injectors that are flowing less etc...
Driving a car up and down the street and adjusting tables is not giving him concrete information of what's happening.
I have had turbo cars making 120-190 whp on big turbos at 10-14 psi,lol we found the issues on the Dyno and they were electrical not mechanical nor tuning wise.
Dyno the car and it will give you a starting point if you even have issues. No one on here can help you unless you know where your at.
I don't even waste my time street tuning at full throttle on the street, to dangerous and you are just going off feel.
As forum members that the most responsible advise you can give someone and worth listening.
I basically live at the Dyno constantly doing cars helping with issues and learning.
2011-08-22 03:06:52
#354
I was being sacrastic. lol Man you guys take everything way too personal over there. What started out being advice then turned into a his problem is his tune and only the tune but there are several people that have proved otherwise. So again, you cant say what you dont know. Again Vadim hasnt dynod so who knows if his car is making close to what it should be making at 10-12psi. I mean his car with all the turbo stuff on it is probably now weighing in over 2800 lbs or more. Not light at all. We are not talking about a 2300 lb b13 here. Its not gonna feel anywhere near the same. Just like an na ve in a b13 can go high 13's, put that same stuff into a p11 and you will be lucky to hit 14's. Simple as that. A second at the minimum slower here a second is a lot. And it all comes down to weight. Thats it.

So we can end this whole argument now as i said now 4 pages back, its pointless. Arguments over non existent numbers all because Vadim said it originally didnt feel as fast as it should then after adjustments that I first suggested to him btw, he said it felt much better but the argument still went on about non existent numbers. Please. You can say what you want and im not doubting you know what your doing. There are many to attest to that. But to say others that have done testing of different things and had proven results and putting out their suggestions to Vadim to make more power safely, is absolutely stupid. Its proven the VET cams will make way more power on his setup. Far more power than fine tuning it will. Been proven and been proven to be more efficient. To say thats not the issue or whatever is stupid when numbers are right there in front of your face.

Again how bout we just end this now, huh? Its wasting everyones time.
2011-08-22 03:09:15
#355
Originally Posted by SR20GTi-R
Pm me or call me Vadim. I'll be glad to speak.

I'm done posting on the forum.


I am not biased towards anyone but I will tell you this man has helped me with a lot of questions and concerns I have had with my car and setup and he has always helped me greatly. I would atleast listen to the advise he is offering to you.
2011-08-22 03:10:19
#356
Originally Posted by Scrildo
Sorry if someone mentioned this already but I'm browing from my cell phone and didn't read through this entire thread. Looking at the pics from the first page and the bov flangeit seems you are running a greddy type s or type rs or even a hks racing bov if you are ditch that pos and go with a hks ssqv those other ones leak bad under boost.


I pressure tested the system to above 25 psi (my boost gauge only reads up to 25 psi). The only place it started leaking boost is above 20 psi at the turbo itself (where it bolts to the CHRA).

Originally Posted by cortrim1
I stopped using jwt because of this. No off the self tune was ever right on any of my cars and I ended up having to use a safc-2 to fix things. On the other hand I have had one of Setzer's tunes on my car and it ran like a champ out of the box. Thats not to say there was not room for improvement. I moved on to a Aem due to lack for flexibility in the tuning software that was around at the time.


Agreed on this, JWT is a nice base tune to get your car running and never modify it past what you requested JWT tune to be. I personally cannot even see how people can run a JWT tune reliably on very specific setups.

Originally Posted by Coheed
Well, if everyone here has tunnel vision I'd like to know what you guys suppose. I mean, Vadim has taken a lot of other people's advice, to no avail.

So if you have suggestions, please help. I'm always willing to learn new things. But everyone told me the same exact thing as Vadim, and it really took me doing my own experimentation and documenting the results to benefit everyone and prevent the same scenario. And yet, some of you still believe that what Vadim is experiencing is related to [insert magical cure here].

So if this is a tuning issue, how would you fix it?


Originally Posted by Rockwood

BTW, not sure if this was already addressed (read the first 5-6 pages, then the last 3-4 pages), but the stock knock sensor is nearly worthless at higher power levels. As I recall from back in the day, JWT said their tune ignores knock sensor input on the larger injector setups because it gives too many false readings.


Yup well aware of this. The OEM tune ignores the knock sensor feedback above 4800 rpm because engine noise is too great at that point. I believe I saw the same mentioned in the FSM.

Now here is my theory on the false knocks that I'm seeing. VE engine runs a lot smoother then my DE ran. The knock sensor looks for voltage spikes, and counts that as a knock. Thus if the stock DE regular voltage is 1v, then a spike would be 2v, and counted as a knock. I'm seeing voltages between .30-2v while regularly driving. I've seen the possible knocks at 1-1.5v. I'm wondering if my knock sensor needs to be replaced though (2 years old).

Originally Posted by SE-Rican
Do me favor. Explain to me why cars with simillar set ups as Vadims are making more power?

Maybe it's the FL inflated numbers theory?


Originally Posted by SR20GTi-R
Lol.

I would but I just don't have it in me.

I wish all you guys the best.


I really respect you guys, and appreciate your feedback and your help. But honestly I have not received any details on how you guys get away with logs and VE cams. I'm trying to run as much timing possible without knock, well what looks to be real knock (2-4 knock sensor voltage). I'm not hearing any knock, but I've never heard knock in person thus I don't know what to listen for. Maybe there are some timing tricks, but you guys haven't not shared anything. Which you are not required to do so, but when you are going to shout YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG, it would be nice to have some proper advise.

Now if I came on here claiming to be making great numbers on a restrictive manifold, you guys would drill me to the ground until I gave real dyno numbers. So far you guys are expecting us to just convert to what you guys are saying without showing any real numbers or even mentioning anything that would lead to those numbers that you guys are getting.

Originally Posted by SE-Rican

Vadim I hope you get your car figured out bro.

Thanks man I appreciate it, I finally feel better about the car since the SPAL fans are actually cooling the car enough to run ac up a mountain!

Originally Posted by Coheed
If you guys were making power like you claim, you would break trannies. Unless your car is completely gutted, you cannot fight simple physics. But that's not the point. The point is that you guys come in here with this "almighty" attitude, and tell Vadim that his tune is wrong. Just like you guys told me that the VET cams would suck. Just like you guys told me that reversion is "theory".

To say that you know that his tune is the issue is juvenile, especially since you guys haven't (in most cases) done all the testing I have. It's all well documented, and I've posted the quotes.

Point is, you guys come in and say he is doing everything wrong. But you give no insight to him. I've asked before, and I'll ask again. If there is something wrong with his setup, what do you think it is, and what would you do to fix it?


Now my tune being wrong shouldn't be dismissed. It could very well be wrong. It's just hard to say when all we are being told is your doing it wrong

Originally Posted by TeKKiE

And as for Ashton and his retarded comment: Calum hasn't put out a single tune. He's a hardware guy and CLEARLY states that. His tunes are nothing more than JWT-esque. They ballpark you so that YOU have to do the work to get the car running 100%.


Not true, Calum hand tuned a tune that he gave me/gave to other B14 DET users. I made 10-15 more WHP on his newer tune then some of his older tunes that I found on the forum. When I asked him about it, he said he hand tuned it on his B14.

Originally Posted by Coheed
In any case, you should feel the VVL kick a lot harder than it does. You should Feel it. Period. Vadim is hearing it kick, with no real movement of power.


Originally Posted by gio94sr20ve
I think the Florida guys ego comment is crazy, I doubt Florida boys have demonstrated egos on this thread.
All I'm saying On here is Dyno it and you'll find a factual answer On your specific setup.
I give no input on what he should do unlike others unless you actually tune and then go from there.
DYNO time and actually tuning fuel timing and anything mechanical.
Work with your budget and if what you have is what you can get with what your willing to invest, then tune it and make sure it's safe. That's all I've been saying.
Coheed I have not broken a gearbox because I have learned how to drive to not break them and refined my driving habits to not tear them.
Yes I am an aggressive driver and I do not lift off the gas to shift, I just learned in what gear to put the power, you look at the three racing vids of me at the events and you don't hear me bouncing off the rev limiter in everygear.
Breaking stuff does not always mean power.
I had a friend that broke a clutch disk every week, does that mean he made power no, he just did not shift right.
13 years owning stick shift cars and I have yet to bust a clutch.
VADIM Dyno the car, you'll get your true answer. Not hunches.


No kidding, need to hit up the dyno now just to see what's going on. I do have a beltronics accelerometer, I k,now a few guys south of the border that use them

Originally Posted by Boostlee
Great info in this thread

Speaking on which, where is Vadim?? Any updates sir??


At least know I can tell people, if you want to make easy power don't do a log manifold on VE. You can make a ton of power, it's just not widely known as how to. What we do know is reversion on VE cams is bad with restrictive manifolds/turbos.

Now according to the FSM and 96-99 cams, there is only 8* of overlap. Highport cams seem to have 16* of overlap.
Last edited by Vadim on 2011-08-22 at 03-15-09.
2011-08-22 03:13:53
#357
Originally Posted by ashtonsser
Because there is a magical 50whp in a tune over someone who knows fairly well how to tune. lol obviously.


Sarcasm= nono
Since you know so much, would you be so kind as to answer some of my questions
What was his afr throughout the full throttle pulls.
Is his Ecu retarding timing or is it actually giving him the timing he inputed in the tables.
Is the fuel pressure holding
Does his seat graph(power graph) feel (look)rough he maybe having spark skip or erratic timing (ask cause I have dealt with it).
What can you tell us.
2011-08-22 03:18:37
#358
Vadim, detonation sounds like rocks in a can basicly. Louder the more heavier it is. There are occasions where you will get knock and not be able to hear it especially in the high rpm range.

If you worried about not being able to detect it by ear. Do a pull that your seeing spikes of knock on the logs. Do the pull in say 3rd gear and right as you let off at redline, shut the motor off and coast to the side and pull the number 1 plug and see if you see any speckles on the insulation around the tip or any deterioration of the ground strap. If so your getting detonation. If not what your seeing is more than likely false signals.

This is what we were doing on the dyno. Do the pull and after a clean or even a pull that was breaking up pull the plug and see if there is detonation. Its pretty easy to tell on the plugs.
2011-08-22 03:25:05
#359
Vadim can answer that stuff. He told me a couple but i will let him chime in on it. Again im pretty sure he knows what he is doing but yes he is still learning. Again i never said getting his car dialed in by tuning it or someone that really knows their stuff tuning it wont pick up power. Quite the opposite but its not gonna be as significant as what some are claiming especially since Vadim already has a good hold on things and for the most part knows what he is doing.

Again, im just with Coheed and know there are more benificial ways for his car to make more power efficiently than tuning it. Now combine both and his car will be everything he had hoped for. simple as that.
2011-08-22 03:29:16
#360
Coheed made some nice testing, but if he could not tune timing rpm by rpm and his fuel I would not know what to tell you about getting the most out of his setup.
Jwt ecus are nice but when I sold it and went to a tunable one I picked up nearly 50 whp in the mid range and a few hp on the top end side. On the jwt Ecu I moved the distributor back and forth from the 15degree base and if I gain here I lost there and if I gained there I lost here. Tuning Is key.
I will take a pic of my jwt graph vs my own tune, we'll see what's next.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top