Ignore them. They have no experience with tuning a timing map. They are all getting completely confused. They are thinking base ignition timing.
What rpm did you do this? Anything above 1,500 rpm would not really show you much since torque stays about the same around there and soon after.
Originally Posted by Vadim
Alright played around with the TP. At a very low speed I put it into the highest gear possible then opened the throttle all the way. The car very slowly picked up the speed, but the boost gauge stayed at 0psi, which is what we wanted.
Looking back at the data logs, I see where the throttle is 100% open, the TP (Engine Load) spikes up to 60 TP, then instantly backs down to 55. My 0 psi is around 55 TP. Thus Nissan TP is proportionate to the airflow. I also do see a spike up in the MAF voltages, by about 1 volt.
That is a bit surprising, but not entirely so. I'd be real curious how the TP log would go through the entire rev range assuming you could keep things at 0 psi the entire time. I would wager TP would rise and fall with torque.Alright played around with the TP. At a very low speed I put it into the highest gear possible then opened the throttle all the way. The car very slowly picked up the speed, but the boost gauge stayed at 0psi, which is what we wanted.
Looking back at the data logs, I see where the throttle is 100% open, the TP (Engine Load) spikes up to 60 TP, then instantly backs down to 55. My 0 psi is around 55 TP. Thus Nissan TP is proportionate to the airflow. I also do see a spike up in the MAF voltages, by about 1 volt.
What rpm did you do this? Anything above 1,500 rpm would not really show you much since torque stays about the same around there and soon after.