Originally Posted by
totaled200ser I completely agree on this as I would choose a ve with stock cams over a det with s4's anyday. I also know the ve is a much better head design, which is why I have been pushing him towards it since the begining. Vadim- The S4's idle louder because there is now low cam lobe. The stock 2.0VE cams will idle about the same if you lock the high lobes in at idle, which is basically defeating the purpose of the VVL. You do not need smaller cams than the 2.0VE as the small lobes are relatively small and will get you the gas mileage you desire especially when you add in the fact of the higher compression of the VE.
Oh I'm not even thinking about S4's. For that cost VE any day
. Another thing that's pushing me away from VE is wiring everything up. I'm a computer guy but for some reason in cars I tend to like mechanical work more.
Another thing I was thinking about is, I'm quite impressed with how fast even an RR with an intake revs up. It gets up to speed in 1st and 2nd gear pretty quickly too. Having a VE would help it get up to speed a lot quicker, thus I'm thinking if it's even worth boosting it. Hence for now I will use what I have sitting in my garage, DET, External gated GTiR T28, O2 induction mani (might sell this one), 3" exhaust. See what power/MPG that gets, if it rocks I'll leave it, if it sucks I'll VE it
.
Originally Posted by
LOUROK if mpg's are the main concern why not just do a 6speed swap?
I be boosting 15psi all day long my DE after the metal hg install.
6 speed gears tend to be shorter, so you get the same effect. Also having a lower RPM at say 70mph wont necessarily help the gas mileage if you have to WOT get to 71mph.
General thought in this area is, be as close to max torque range without going over. Closer you are to max torque the more efficient the engine is.