Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Dyno pulls; Sat. 3/1/08

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 21-28 of 28
2008-03-03 05:22:25
#21
There is absolutely no need for a power fc with a t28. Not to mention its many times more than a realtime.
2008-03-03 05:34:43
#22
Originally Posted by XxToKeSxX
I think any mod that you add at this point is just going to make that thing spin earlier... and harder. Your spinning like crazy at stock boost?

I opt for bigger turbo! do it do it... maybe introduce some lag in your life, peer pressure peer pressure the high compression takes care of the low end I think.


Well you solved my BOV issues but I'm going to take my time with this set-up.
2008-03-03 05:44:35
#23
Originally Posted by Benito
Well you solved my BOV issues but I'm going to take my time with this set-up.


Ha ha, it wasn't me it was mitsubishi!

I think when all is sorted out this car will be a bad mother hush yo mouf.
2008-03-04 00:32:49
#24
Originally Posted by Setzer
There is absolutely no need for a power fc with a t28. Not to mention its many times more than a realtime.


Yeah I hear you. I'm kind of settling into the idea of a real-time ecu.

I am going to pick your brain a little bit about that map you supplied me awhile back.

http://www.sr20forum.com/rom-ecu-tuning-file-exchange/216261-turbo-bin-n60-370-a.html

I ended up just getting Calum's program. I am wondering if yours has some timing pulled out in the middle versus Calum's program. The car pinged on 2 aborted pulls at torque peak but seems to tolerate the timing on the top end on the good pulls. Turning it back across the board keeps the tq peak static but is probably robbing my top. I plan to research and plunge into this end of things myself.

Power FC does seem nice but I have a strong aversion to paying people to do things I could learn myself.

Thanks again Ameen. Slips coming soon.
2008-03-04 04:03:04
#25
260 on 9 psi is really really good.
2008-03-04 04:53:33
#26
Originally Posted by Benito
Yeah I hear you. I'm kind of settling into the idea of a real-time ecu.

I am going to pick your brain a little bit about that map you supplied me awhile back.

http://www.sr20forum.com/rom-ecu-tuning-file-exchange/216261-turbo-bin-n60-370-a.html

I ended up just getting Calum's program. I am wondering if yours has some timing pulled out in the middle versus Calum's program. The car pinged on 2 aborted pulls at torque peak but seems to tolerate the timing on the top end on the good pulls. Turning it back across the board keeps the tq peak static but is probably robbing my top. I plan to research and plunge into this end of things myself.

Power FC does seem nice but I have a strong aversion to paying people to do things I could learn myself.

Thanks again Ameen. Slips coming soon.


Playing with your timing is very easy with the realtime. Now what you are saying is the map Calum gave you or the one I gave you pinged?
2008-03-04 06:15:05
#27
I think the one I shipped the ecu with.
2008-03-04 14:26:27
#28
Originally Posted by Calum
I think the one I shipped the ecu with.


Yes the car pinged with Calum's program. I ended up using his program because they guy who was supposed to burn me some chips flaked out.

I could use a program with less timing in the mid range. I thought to give Setzer's a try. How do the air/fuel maps compare? Does that sound like something you two could check at some point? It could help me while I put together money for the real time.

If i could look at it myself I would but I have never been able to get anything to work with my Mac.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top