Originally Posted by
SE-Rawkus What problems do you see in it?
Just for comparison between both turbos, these are the specs on each:
GT2871R (Flow capacity of 400 HP)
Turbine
-Wheel: 53.85mm w/ 76 trim
-Housing: .86 or .64 ar
Compressor
-Wheel: 71mm w/ 56 trim
-Housing: .60 ar
GT2876R aka GT25/40R (Flow capacity of 450 HP)
Turbine
-Wheel: 53mm w/ 62 trim
-Housing: .64 ar, .86 ar
Compressor
-Wheel: 76mm w/ 48 trim
-Housing: .70 ar
My opinion, I think the GT2876R isn't bad at all. Gives you that inbetween turbo between the GT3071R and the GT2871R.
You have to have a reason behind your opinion. Its obviuos by what they are saying it makes inbetween hp of the turbos listed above. You can find that on the ATP web site.
I have run this turbo before around 1997
This turbo is also known as the GT2840R and first came into the market and was sold by HKS. This turbo is a very bad match of comp and turbine wheels. When the Comp wheel starts to get into its peak effiency range the turbine wheel is going quickly out of its effiency range.
The best choice of turbos like I said is the GT2871R and GT3076R
The GT3076R is also known as the Incon GTBB37 which was a major force in many monster mustang and corvette turbo kits. When the USA caught up with Incons designs they lost their grip in the USA as they were readyily available.
Look how long I have had my Incon GTBB37 and now hol long has this turbo called the GT3076R been on the market. Even Lance bought this same turbo and he will tell you it is incredible.
I have been pushing these small turbos from back in the mid 90s. They are compact, supercharger like response and big hp numbers.