Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Possible Group Buy Intake Manis!!! Taking Orders!!!!

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 61-70 of 98
2009-09-17 05:45:24
#61
Dyno results and what length would be good for a 28r-2871r Haven't decided if I'm going to go 28rs or 71r in the future. Currently with a 28r.

Can we get a cruise control bracket mounted also with the throttle bracket?
2009-09-17 05:50:57
#62
you guys suck KOCKS
2009-09-17 12:14:32
#63
Originally Posted by LikeTheMovies
Dyno results and what length would be good for a 28r-2871r Haven't decided if I'm going to go 28rs or 71r in the future. Currently with a 28r.

Can we get a cruise control bracket mounted also with the throttle bracket?


you might have to do your own bracket which all it would require is going to a weld shop and having them weld one on which is what im doing with mine. 10 bucks and done. That way you know its in the place you need it and its right.
2009-09-17 13:45:14
#64
Originally Posted by LikeTheMovies
Dyno results and what length would be good for a 28r-2871r Haven't decided if I'm going to go 28rs or 71r in the future. Currently with a 28r.

Can we get a cruise control bracket mounted also with the throttle bracket?


the 28rs and the 71r both spool at lower rpm thus creating good low to mid range power, so having a intake manifold that is going to take advantage of top end peak power would be nice. you would definitly see greater results with longer runner lengths. if you went with shorter runner lengths it would increase the response of the turbo but personally if you are going to get cams that too will increase bottom end to mid range also depending on the camshafts..... so in short longer runner lengths
2009-09-17 14:02:45
#65
Also if someone that is a member of G20.net could post the link to the group buy up as well i would greatly appreciate it.

Thanks.
2009-09-17 14:22:59
#66
I think GB's have been banned on Gnet. We have had a few disasters this year. I will look into it.

I put a post in the GB section but it said it had to be approved by the mods.
2009-09-17 14:37:53
#67
Originally Posted by GT2871RBLUBIRD
one thing about runner length is that not only is it going be different lengths for NA or turbo but they both use the same general idea, longer lengths is going to be good for top end, shorter lengths are going to be good for bottom end power.
You've got that backwards.
2009-09-17 14:42:13
#68
Originally Posted by BenFenner
You've got that backwards.


I was just going to tell him that also.....Ben is right 100%
I almost corrected him on the other post where he said the same thing, but I didn't want to get into that discussion. I know you like to explain things more than I do, so when he asks, it's all yours Ben
2009-09-17 15:22:36
#69
The intake manifold correct them where they say the runner lengths that are longer make more power at top end /

''In terms of intake manifold runner length, a longer intake runner produces better power at high RPM, while a shorter intake runner produces better power at low PRM. Generally, an intake manifold runner that is in the region of 300-400 mm long will sustain power at high RPM but little power at low RPM while an intake manifold runner that is in the region of 200-300 mm long will start building power from low RPM but will run out of power soon after peak power is reached. But note that the intake port on the cylinder head forms part of the intake runner. Thus the intake runner length is measured from the intake valve seat to the intake runner bell mouth, and not from the end of the intake manifold.''
2009-09-17 16:57:33
#70
Originally Posted by BenFenner
You've got that backwards.


beat me to it. i've always been taught, long runners= low end torque, short runners=top end hp...
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top