Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Yada yada, more dynos.

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 11-20 of 262
2009-09-14 01:38:21
#11
Here are my two maf scales. First one I dynod at 361whp. The 2nd one was 21psi, instead of 16. Anyone have a maf scale so you know about what power you are at?



2009-09-14 01:55:54
#12
Originally Posted by ashtonsser
its good to see your power is back up to where it was before and glad to hear the trans is holding up great.

After the intake manifold goes on ill be hitting up the same dyno i went to before for comparison results. im hoping to be at the 450whp range at the same 19psi of boost and hopefully if all goes well around 550whp at 26-27psi of boost.

I just got done rebuilding my turbo and it was a complete success after figuring out that i put the washer under the 360 deg thrust bearing upside down so the stupid thing would not turn when i tightened the compressor nut down. but i got it and it works beautifully.

You should see the 270 deg thrust washer i pulled out. It was soo worn that the the brass started to crack, Put it this way i had a good 1/4 inch if not more of in and out play. Luckily for me i rebuilt it just in time. The compressor had just started to contact the housing, Not enough to do any major damage just put some slight scuffs on it. No chips or anything like that though.

congrats man.


No offense man but do your responses have to always be 2/3 about your setup? Everyone knows what you are up to. Its phenomenal but ....

Looks like a hard charger Coheed. Thanks for sharing.
2009-09-14 02:18:47
#13
Originally Posted by Benito
No offense man but do your responses have to always be 2/3 about your setup? Everyone knows what you are up to. Its phenomenal but ....

Looks like a hard charger Coheed. Thanks for sharing.


not all my posts are this way, some yes, but all no, I dont have my own thread about my own setup. Im sure coheed doesnt mind me sharing on what my turbo looked like when i rebuilt it. I dont feel like making a new thread saying i rebuilt my turbo and im gonna be heading back to the dyno soon. If you look at coheeds posts in other peoples threads he explains things the same way. No need for a whole new thread to say what people is up to.

This general thread is talking about power he made and comparisons are always a good thing. Its not like i was completely off topic like hey guys im heading back to the dyno.

I made a comment concerning his posts and added a bit in. Its ok. If coheed doesnt like this then he can let me know.



Anyways Coheed whats up with the huge dip in the A/F reading, Is that your VVL point, Thats a huge dip i know its a sudden change in flow of air but dang, Its almost looks like the throttle was let off and then back on.
2009-09-14 03:31:01
#14
I don't mind at all. the dip is caused by the hiccup when I shift. The car seemed to buck a little bit on the shift, which I think is a byproduct of my blow-thru. You can see where I shift, the maf voltage drops; comes back up again, dips for a sec, then comes back up.

You feel it when driving and it bugs the hell out of me. The couplers on my setup are 2.5-3" adapters at the maf. So it goes from 2.5" to 3" at the maf, then right back to 2.5" after the maf. This may have something to do with it. Maybe if it were 3" throughout it wouldn't be an issue, but I am going back to pull-thru. The AFRs, and response was actually better! Blow-thru is not all it is hyped up to be, and I showed last year how it can hurt your setup if the tune isn't spot-on. We made 30whp when changing back to a pull-through because maf readings were more accurate.

I just really wanna run a more effective crankcase vent system, and pull-thru will be more reliable with it the way I want it.
2009-09-14 03:32:56
#15
I would like to see some data from some big # setups running this Z32 maf to see what kind of voltage they hit. If we get a good idea, then maybe someone can make a chart with voltage vs WHP.

4.7V should be 400whp or so.
2009-09-14 03:38:22
#16
Quote from PAYU
I get 4.77 V on my car at 16psi good for 432whp 315ft/lbs... At 5.11v It makes 524whp 25psi just to give you an example...


This is exactly the voltage I see on my maf. Now, that should say something. I am at 4500ft too. But pushing 22psi of boost falling to 21 quickly afterwards.

Even at 25psi I bet I won't break past 4.85V. Maybe if it were below 80* outside, and sea level I would nail at least that much.
2009-09-14 04:29:34
#17
Originally Posted by ashtonsser
not all my posts are this way, some yes, but all no, I dont have my own thread about my own setup. Im sure coheed doesnt mind me sharing on what my turbo looked like when i rebuilt it. I dont feel like making a new thread saying i rebuilt my turbo and im gonna be heading back to the dyno soon. If you look at coheeds posts in other peoples threads he explains things the same way. No need for a whole new thread to say what people is up to.

This general thread is talking about power he made and comparisons are always a good thing. Its not like i was completely off topic like hey guys im heading back to the dyno.

I made a comment concerning his posts and added a bit in. Its ok. If coheed doesnt like this then he can let me know.



Anyways Coheed whats up with the huge dip in the A/F reading, Is that your VVL point, Thats a huge dip i know its a sudden change in flow of air but dang, Its almost looks like the throttle was let off and then back on.


Its just hard to read. I just skip your posts mostly choeeds mmv.
2009-09-14 07:32:13
#18
ok that makes sense on the voltage drop, i thought that was from your dyno run. I was like man thats a huge drop. haha

Im sure there is some differnece in changing piping size, Matter fact i just changed all my piping so that its all 3". The way i had it before it would go 2.5" out of the turbo to 3" at my bov adapter. 3" to intercooler, 2.5" coming out going up into the bay to the maf, 3" on the maf and 3" to the throttle body.

Now after i rebuilt the turbo i redid all the piping so its much cleaner and i dont have 3" couplers clamped down onto a 2.5" pipe. Its all nice and smooth all 3". Its gonna be real nice after the mani goes on and the Q45 throttle body is 3" as well. It should make for a very nice smooth flow with a very nice gain. haha

Ive been runing my z32 maf in blowthrough since the beginning and have yet to really see any problems but you are right, The tune at first was very finiky and required some adjustments to get it to run spot on. Now im gonna have to make more changes, Also cuz i noticed when i redid my piping i had a nasty boost leak at my bov due to the tial knockoff, the bottom plate that seals it fell off. I noticed the car is soooo much more responsive partial throttle and full throttle throughout the band and the wideband is showing it to be a little bit leaner.

I might actually be able to have my vac line on my afpr now and fine tune it once the mani goes on.

High hp motors are very finiky to get running very smoothly. lol
2009-09-14 11:39:07
#19
What is the observed number and SAE .. ?? send me the file.

regards-
2009-09-14 12:44:15
#20
I wish I had some sae numbers, I will see if they can get me any info on my runs to see what correction was used.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top