Thread: 571.9whp.......... OH YEAH!!!

+ Reply To Thread

First

Last

Posts: 51-60 of 72

Search Thread

2009-06-01 15:17:26

#51

N-eggs 2000 Online/offline status of N-eggs 2000 is unknown

egg beater

Join Date: 2007-12-17
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 148
Trader Score: 1 (100%)

awesome. i love seeing DET's make big power. everyone i know locally thinks it's a waste of time to build anything other than a GTI-R

top-of-the-line build guys! can't wait to see a 600+ WHP DET powered NX!

are we going to see any drag strip numbers out of this car?

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

-Mark
'93 NX2000 (11.39@127) for sale soon
'74 260Z (rusty project)
'03 VW Jetta TDI

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-06-01 17:11:26

#52

jpsr20det

Member

Join Date: 2008-08-25
Location:
Posts: 563
Trader Score: 0 (0%)

Originally Posted by wnwright

I respect your opinion... But my experiences haven't been the same. I just went back to RR head from VE... Same bottom end same turbo setup and I picked up power up top. I lost a decent amount of midrange, but I think that is also partial due to the drop in compression and partially the cams.

I went all the way to N1 manifold and ported head to try and get what I thought should have been there.

I have done multiple setups on both heads back to back and the RR was always better in my experience. With all the HYPE I read on the VE-T setups I was very disappointed the only thing the VE-T ever had was more midrange (3-5k rpm) power.

I will say for a great street setup run a VE with 3071 or 3076.

sorry for the of topic but what was your turbo setup??gti-r manifold?
thanks.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-06-01 17:15:44

#53

SE-Rican

Puppy Kicker!

Join Date: 2007-12-12
Location: Avon, Ohio
Posts: 6,608
Trader Score: 6 (100%)

SC-61 seems really laggy. What are the exact specs of your SC-61?

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

SR20Deep
1992 Turbo SE-R

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-06-01 17:24:54

#54

Payu

Member

Join Date: 2007-12-23
Location: Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,284
Trader Score: 8 (100%)

Rob the lag on that car its caused by the BC Stage3 cams on you VE setup you should reach full boost by 4800rpm's easy...
Thats why I am not using the BC Stage 3 cams anymore I switched to Tomei and the difference its Day and Night ....
Dont get me wrong the cams are not bad but they need to play with cam gears to fix that problem...

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-06-01 17:29:53

#55

dmp316

Yard Man

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location: Cape Coral,FL and Jamaica
Posts: 3,142
Trader Score: 22 (100%)

Very well gone. i am loving the numbers. Are you using a EMs or calum RT for tuning?

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Damien
90 Supra
2013 Sonata

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-06-01 18:41:37

#56

sniper571

Member

Join Date: 2008-01-22
Location:
Posts: 566
Trader Score: 7 (100%)

Originally Posted by dmp316

Very well gone. i am loving the numbers. Are you using a EMs or calum RT for tuning?

We are using an AEM EMS.... yeah its a bit laggy, which can be attributed to the BC stg3 cams. The car still needs some tweaking, and we might look into getting the cam gears to try and dial them in more. Its still a 61 so Im always going to have to deal with lag as with any larger turbo set-up, but yes there are some options we still need to look at.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Ready to rumble finally!!!

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-06-01 18:44:49

#57

ashtonsser Online/offline status of ashtonsser is unknown

SR20VETeran

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location: Copperas Cove, Tx
Posts: 9,349
Trader Score: 13 (100%)

who cares about lag when your making 600hp, cuz usually all the lag is accounted for is lower rpm's but with the larger turbos your powerband will just shift upwards but in the longrun your powerband will still be about the same amount of rpms but for straight line use a taller powerband is better anyways.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

1992 Nissan Sentra SE-R - Fully Built SR20VE, BWS400SX Billet 67mm and much more
JMS Racing tuned to 716whp, 423wtq at 29psi
10.5 @ 149.2mph to date I believe the fastest trap speed SE-R, Much more to come with some changes!

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-06-01 19:10:09

#58

Cliff

Member

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location: Bel Air, MD.
Posts: 11,653
Trader Score: 20 (100%)

Originally Posted by sniper571

I'm subscribing especially to see what kind of numbers you can pull out by tweaking those Stage 3's. I haven't really considered slapping gears on mine yet, but once I get the CS camgears I won from the convention, I may do just that.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

'17 Golf R

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-06-01 19:29:09

#59

Keo

Horse Beater!

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location: Maryland
Posts: 9,499
Trader Score: 70 (100%)

Originally Posted by ashtonsser

the people that bitch about lag is the same person that bitch about no traction cause there turbo spools to fast! lol

back on topic, nice numbers!

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

My Feedback

Originally Posted by Cliff

You are now known as "1 Up Chuck".

for a good time call
410-347-1488 (rejection hotline!)

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-06-01 20:48:53

#60

ca18 bluebird Online/offline status of ca18 bluebird is unknown

Member

Join Date: 2008-07-23
Location:
Posts: 890
Trader Score: 0 (0%)

Originally Posted by TeKKiE

N1 cams were run in his wnwright's car, IIRC.

ok well if he was running n1 cams i assume he was running a big turbo and good manifold too. If not these cams will be useless as the overlap will make it very hard to pressurize the cylinder. Will be interesting even on jp's set up to see if n1's make power. Even with his turbo he still might need revs to make power, and i wouldn't be totally surprised if 20v cams out perform the n1's, but hopefully we will see soon.

anyway i should probably stop hijacking the thread. My apologies to sniper571

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Reply Reply With Quote

First

Last

+ Reply To Thread

Thread Information

There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
StubUserName