![](/images/threads/icons/0.png)
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
![](/images/bbcode/view_post.gif)
I can find just as many posts about them being praised on the pulsar forums (as well as the internet, here, etc.) that exist with people ****ting on them.
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
What are you talking about
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
The very early SSAC headers use to crack just like the Hot**** header.
The fact that SSAC headers cracked from the beginning is expected. They copied Hotshot's header, and did such a good job of it they had the same problems. No surprises there.
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
SSAC listemed to their customers and made the header thicker and they stopped cracking.
We are talking about turbo manifolds here though. Saying an N/A header from SSAC doesn't crack means nothing in this context because it is not a turbo manifold. Making an N/A header that doesn't crack is child's play. Your other methods of backing up SSAC are valid. But saying they make an N/A header that doesn't crack so their turbo header is probably not going to crack is like saying a Doctor performed a successful circumcision so his brain surgery must be pretty good too.