Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Turbo oil feed and drain tech. Do I need a restrictor or not?

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 1-10 of 57
2008-12-05 21:30:45
#1
Turbo oil feed and drain tech. Do I need a restrictor or not?
I just finished reading another thread where someone was unsure if they needed a restrictor or not in their turbo feed.
Hell, I even asked this question a couple months ago.
Since then I've made it my job to understand what's going on here (as I usually do) and I'd like to share the knowledge I've found.

This information comes from an e-mail with a Borg Warner technician (Edit: Garrett retailer) that I can reproduce here if necessary (it'll have to wait until I get home).

Here goes.

Turbocharger oil seals will handle just about any amount of oil pressure you can throw at them. Apparently turbochargers have more trouble with air getting into the oil than oil leaking past the seals. I know this goes against what you've heard. Turbo oil seals are mainly designed to keep intake boost pressure and exhaust pressure out of the oil system. They are not designed to keep oil in, they are designed to keep air out. That's not to say that they don't keep oil in, it's just the way the seals are designed. It is much easier for the seals to hold the oil pressure in, so they actually have a much harder problem to deal with, which is keeping the pressurized intake charge or exhaust gases out of the oil system.

We could use an example. Okay, assume you have a typical turbocharger with an oil feed line with no restrictor. This allows 80-120 psi oil pressure inside the bearing assembly and places 80-120 psi pressure on the oil seals. On the other end of the oil seals you have let's say 20 psi of boost pressure, and for fun let's say we have 20 psi of exhaust pressure. This pressure on the other side of the seal makes the net pressure on the seal 20 psi less. So the seals really see 60-100 psi of oil pressure. This is what they were designed to handle and actually make use of the high oil pressure to keep intake and exhaust gases out.

There's a problem with this situation on smaller turbos. Small turbos typically have smaller oil drain outlets. Improper oil drainage is the true cause of compromised turbo oil seals. There usually is no way to drain oil fast enough from a smaller turbo with it's small outlet to keep up with the flow of oil through the turbo. Once the oil in the drain backs up to the bearing the pressure placed on the turbo oil seals usually increases until the oil seals are compromised.

The problem gets even worse with ball bearing turbos (as compared to journal bearing) where the bearing operation introduces much more air into the oil (frothing) than typical journal bearings. This creates a much quicker overload of the oil drain, causing the backup to happen faster.

Have you ever wondered why a larger turbo oil seal could handle higher oil pressure than a smaller one? It doesn't make any sense at all. It's not that the oil seals are weaker in small turbos. It's that the oil drains are smaller.

Have you ever wondered why ball bearing turbos needed restrictors when a journal bearing in the same application wouldn't? It seems to make sense that a ball bearing has tighter tolerances than a journal bearing, so it would need less oil, but why would it need less pressure? And why would more oil (flow) in the feed line be a problem? The reality is that the ball bearing can pass just as much oil as a journal bearing, it just makes it more frothy due to the tighter tolerances and design. It's this highly frothy oil and eventual oil drain back-up that causes the observed problems with aggressively feeding a ball bearing turbo.

Big turbos usually have big oil drains and can run largely unrestricted lines. Small turbos have small oil drains and usually require a restrictor. It is true that this restrictor lowers the oil pressure seen by the turbo oil seals, but the lower pressure is not the solution to the problem, it is the lower associated flow of oil that solves the problem. Too aggressive of a restrictor can actually cause a different problem. You can lower the oil pressure with a restrictor so far that the oil seals can no longer keep the intake or exhaust gases out of the bearing section and bearing failure can occur. This is the real problem the turbo manufacturer has with their seals and more likely the cause of failure in overly restricted feeds (usually blamed on not enough oil/lubrication).

I know this is going to be controversial so if you need anything clarified, don't hesitate to ask.
Last edited by BenFenner on 2014-08-28 at 19-14-03.
2008-12-05 22:28:31
#2
What you bolded is what I tell everyone. You don't NEED a restrictor, you just need to have proper drainage so you don't flood the turbo. That's why top mount turbos do better at this.
2008-12-05 22:34:22
#3
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought in our cars, we ran restrictors mostly because the lack of one causes low oil pressure issues.
2008-12-05 22:34:33
#4
Here's the e-mail:

All Garrett dual ball bearing turbochargers have an internal oil restrictor. The restrictor is good as long as oil pressure does not exceed approximately 45 PSI. If the engine runs high (>45 PSI Hot) oil pressure it is advisable to use an external oil restrictor (1.2mm). Contrary to popular belief, high oil pressure will not "blow" dynamic (piston ring) oil seals. The dynamic seal on the turbine side of a turbocharger is not an oil seal...it is an exhaust seal. The turbine side seal is installed to keep the exhaust system from contaminating the crankcase.



Hopefully, I answered your questions.



Regards,



John



Limit Engineering, Inc.
Performance Turbochargers
928-453-7321
928-453-0789 (FAX)

Garrett Performance Distributor


It was from a Garrett distributor, not a Borg Warner tech. It was in response to this question from a 3rd party:


One other thing I have to figure out is whether my CHRA has a built in oil restrictor. The shop told me time and time again that it does, yet ATP sells an oil restrictor specifically for the GT28 series turbos. If I don’t have an oil restrictor and need one, I risk blowing seals. If I do have one but done need one, I risk oil starvation. Never got an acceptable answer on this one either...and no one seems to know the answer.
2008-12-06 02:38:19
#5
Originally Posted by Coheed
What you bolded is what I tell everyone. You don't NEED a restrictor, you just need to have proper drainage so you don't flood the turbo. That's why top mount turbos do better at this.



Depends on oil pump, oil type and turbo.. some turbos NEEDS the right restrictor.
I have a top mount( straight oil return line ) turbo with a the huge CHRA (borg warner) and it need a restrictor.
2008-12-06 04:56:18
#6
dosen't the stock banjo bolt have a restrictor in it?
2008-12-06 16:02:44
#7
Originally Posted by trblsme2k2
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought in our cars, we ran restrictors mostly because the lack of one causes low oil pressure issues.


This can also be an issue. BB turbos don't need a lot of oil to run efficiently, and they are cooled with coolant instead of oil. I believe the use of a restrictor is dependant on your setup and how much oil can be removed from the turbo at once. The stock lines have a restrictor built in on a DET and it works for BB turbos too.

You don't want to run a huge oil feed line to the turbo for obvious reasons.

As far as the Borg warner turbos I wonder why they would require a restrictor. They prob strongly recommend it just because on diff setups it can cause issues. That's the only reason they say you "need" one.

If you are worried about it on your setup then just follow the mfgs instructions to insure you have as little trouble as possible.
2008-12-07 00:07:18
#8
I am wondering the same thing, but no one has yet to give an answer... I have the steel braded oil feed line kit and the drain is to the block 1/2" . Does that mean we need a restrictor (t25)?
2008-12-07 01:00:20
#9
Prob not, but it depends on the turbo location and how it s setup to drain correctly.
2008-12-07 11:21:29
#10
You guys are forgetting that if you run no restrictor your engine internals suffer from lack of oil pressure, or at least lower pressure which you dont want.
If the turbo runs fine with a restrictor while it doesnt really need it, why would you take the risk your engine not getting the oil flow it needs?
If your turbo doesnt need a restrictor, find out how much flow it really needs and still use an appropriate restrictor.
Especially BB turbo's, which dont need much oil flow through them are better off using the right restrictor.

Originally Posted by BenFenner
We could use an example. Okay, assume you have a typical turbocharger with an oil feed line with no restrictor. This allows 80-120 psi oil pressure inside the bearing assembly and places 80-120 psi pressure on the oil seals. On the other end of the oil seals you have let's say 20 psi of boost pressure, and for fun let's say we have 20 psi or exhaust pressure. This pressure on the other side of the seal makes the net pressure on the seal 20 psi less. So the seals really see 60-100 psi of oil pressure. This is what they were designed to handle and actually make use of the high oil pressure to keep intake and exhaust gases out.


If it is true that the seals keep the gasses out instead of the oil in, then it would be best for the seals to run exactly the same oil pressure as the boost your running so that the net pressure on the seals is 0. Which is too low for the bearings but make it 50-60 psi. Still enough for a jounal bearing turbo to run properly and way less stress on the seals.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top