Originally Posted by
jpsr20det I agree with you ca18 bluebird.. Any garrett from a 2871 up will need a t3 based turbine housing
Regarding to the spoolup in a fwd car the game its diff you need some lag not boost threshold , the transient responce from the 0.64 to a 0.86 its a night day diff but 200-300 rpm of boost threshold its not that much .
Cheers
bingo, it not like cams where you may loose 200-300rpm is spool up (boost threshold) but gain a lot of power in the mid range and top end and normally gain transitional response once on boost. It's the whole power delivery of the .86 that sucks
ok i defiantly agree with you from the 2871r onwards (gt30 etc), but i do think you get away with the t2 with the 2871r, only because its a small turbine wheel and its really the big comp that gives it its power.
I dont think you NEED a t3 with a T28 turbine, where as with the gt30 you pretty much do. I am not saying there arnt benefits to it, and if you want more power from the gt2871r i would rather a .63 t3 over a .86 t2.
but standard manifold, 2871r and .63 t2, 52 trim is a nice set up imo, but if you want more power than this can provide i would look into different options than the .86 and defiantly agree its t3 flange time
also miko a .63 t3 will flow around the same air as a .86 t2, but the reason why it outspools the .86 t2 is because it biggest restriction is just before the air hit the turbine wheel, which forces the air the speed up at that section. This is same reason the standard manifold has a splitter in it, to speed up the air before it enters the turbine housing. Where on a t2 .86 the t2 flange is probably the biggest restriction, so the air speeds up entering the turbine housing then slows down in the big .86 housing just before it hits the turbine wheel creating slower boost threshold and transient response.