Originally Posted by
JohnnyLOL why even ask the question if its such a horrible myth??Just wanted to tailor my debunking to your reasoning. As expected you went with the "more volume to fill" myth, and I've thankfully already got the answer for that one.
Originally Posted by
JohnnyJust "Debunk" the bitch then.
You got it.
Most of the time I just link to a post I made a while back but I'll boil it down for you here. For a second lets forget about flow through the intercooler and imagine all we want to do is get the air compressed, since that's what you seem so hung up on. No matter that flowing the air through the intercooler will make more power than if it would compress in the intercooler. No, let's forget that for a second and just assume we want to pressurize the bitch.
What's the difference in volume between a smallish intercooler and a large intercooler? 2 liters at most? Okay good. How much does the engine displace? 2 liters? Excellent. How long does it take to pressurize the engine? Oh, two revolutions you say? Alright then... How long is one revolution at idle...
800 revolutions...
..1 minute......=
13.3 revolutions
....1 minute
............60 seconds
........1 second
13.3 revolutions per second works out to 0.075 seconds per revolution, it takes two revolutions to fill the engine so it will take 0.075*2 or 0.15 seconds longer to fill another 2 liter cavity (not taking into account how much easier it is to fill or pressurize the intercooler compared to the engine chocked by tiny valves).
How long is one revolution at some normal operating rpm like 4,000?
4,000 revolutions...
..1 minute......=
66.6 revolutions
....1 minute
............60 seconds
........1 second
66.6 revolutions per second works out to 0.015 seconds per revolution, so it will take 0.015*2 or 0.03 seconds longer to pressurize an additional 2 liter cavity at 4,000 rpm. The question is, would you find this significant enough to continue to recommend an intercooler smaller than another one based on the so-called delay in boost onset?
If you'd like something a little more fleshed out, read this:
Charge pipe sizing & differences: - e30tech.com Forums
Pay attention to post # 18 if you'd like a more general formula. That's a thread about charge pipe size and mythical additional "turbo lag".
Basically with 20-50 pounds of air per minute flowing through the charge pipes a couple of liters here and there are completely insignificant.
Originally Posted by
Johnnyand...slower boost onset....turbo lag....same **** cause its gonna feel just like turbo lag till it builds pressure.Oh really? Tell me what turbo lag feels like. I dare you.