Thread: Anyone run a scatter shield?

No it doesn't. Take a look at all the Honda ones. Mines rap more of the bottom and less of the back

@Kleensleeper , That bolts up using the existing bellhousing bolts?

That's correct.

Only thing that has to be covered is the area around the clutch disc. That's what fly's apart and can kill you as it rips through the car at high rpm. I've always been interested in one, just for safety reasons.

Straight from 2014 rule book guys...

All front-wheel-drive or transverse-mounted applications using a clutch and running 11.49 or quicker, for which an SFI Spec 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, or 9.1 flywheel shield is not commercially available, must be equipped with a flywheel shield made of 1/4-inch minimum thickness steel plate. Shield must surround the bellhousing completely except for area of bellhousing adjacent to differential and axle shaft. Shield may be multi-piece, with pieces bolted together using minimum 3/8-inch-diameter Grade 5 or M10 class 8.8 bolts; may be attached to engine and/or bellhousing.

Wow, I've never seen one that wide.

Only needs to cover the clutch/flywheel but it must go completely around the bell housing. The axles/diff. act as a shield on the back side.

Oh ok lol around the bell housing. I was like DAMN!

Wider is better than lost jewels.....lol Also factor in i'm running twin disk clutch.....

I love how that looks and I agree. I would rather have a wider one god forbid if the shit decided to grenade especially in my tin can. lol.