Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Battle of hp & torque

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 31-40 of 57
2009-08-18 04:34:06
#31
Originally Posted by SneakyOwner
That sucks my t-25 made 250tq and 230whp soo does that mean I'm special since my tq didn't fall on its face?


That's actually very interesting. What PSI where you running? Supporting mods?
2009-10-01 03:31:51
#32
Originally Posted by Will
I dont have the time right now but this is not all accurate from a physics perspective.


RRRIIIIIIIIIIGHT
2009-10-01 20:26:53
#33
Originally Posted by Vadim
That's actually very interesting. What PSI where you running? Supporting mods?


At 4k rpm tq peaked at 255 18psi on a t-25, fmic, 50lb top feeds, 255lph walbro, greddy e-manage. I think my boy is just a tuning genius. His sr20 also t-25 powered with pretty much the same mods as me makes more tq than hp as well. 246whp with 265tq something like that. I guess you guys are missing something in the tuning area. I added BC2's and I have yet to dyno again but I'm sure I gained some hp and a **** ton of tq.
2009-10-01 20:44:42
#34
Originally Posted by blk-nx2000
so you guys are telling me a 200hp .6 liter w/ little torque will move the car just as fast as a 200hp 2 liter with moderate torque? something seems a bit wrong here to me... or am i missing something?[/QUOTE

There are lots of opinions and formulas ect for what tq actually is. But if you are sitting at a stop in a vehicle of the same weight and same hp but one has say 10tq and the other has 30tq that vehicle with 30tq will accelerate 3x faster than the one with 10tq. In the end they will both reach the same speed because they have the same hp but the time to reach the peak speed is determined by the tq. Someone please let me know if I'm wrong.
That's why we have gearing right? If you go from first through 2nd and 3rd up to 100mph its takes a much shorter time to do so than if you started in 3rd and went to 100 mph. The gears are utilizing the engines tq. or lack of tq. at a certain rpm. My turbo car has no problem starting from 2nd gear and doesnt even bog yet my n/a car will slow and bog and take forever to accelerate through the gear. Why? More tq pulls the car through the rpm range faster. Take large diesel trucks for an example. If they did not have 1,000+ ft lbs of tq their cargo would never move.

I honsetly don't understand this hp tq battle because there isn't one. They are two different things that happen to relate to each other a little. If you need to move a big load from a stop then you need alot of tq to get it moving. If you want to top out your car you need the most hp. If you want a good drag car you need a good powerband and custom transmission in order to take advantage or the tq curve and and also take advantage of the high hp in order to get a high trap speed. My solution. IF you don't have enough tq get some nitrous. If you don't have enough hp get a big turbo and then add some nitrous.
srry for rambling.
2009-10-01 21:31:49
#35
Originally Posted by SneakyOwner
There are lots of opinions and formulas ect for what tq actually is. But if you are sitting at a stop in a vehicle of the same weight and same hp but one has say 10tq and the other has 30tq that vehicle with 30tq will accelerate 3x faster than the one with 10tq. In the end they will both reach the same speed because they have the same hp but the time to reach the peak speed is determined by the tq. Someone please let me know if I'm wrong.
You are wrong.

You have left out important information. You say both cars have the same HP. Do you mean peak HP? And at the same rpm?
Then you say they have different torque outputs. Do you mean peak torque? And at what rpm?

Add in all that info and you may have something we can talk about.


Originally Posted by SneakyOwner
My turbo car has no problem starting from 2nd gear and doesnt even bog yet my n/a car will slow and bog and take forever to accelerate through the gear. Why? More power earlier in the rev range pulls the car through the rpm range faster.
Fixed that for yah.

Originally Posted by SneakyOwner
Take large diesel trucks for an example. If they did not have 1,000+ ft lbs of tq their cargo would never move.
Incorrect. You don't need much torque at all to move a heavy truck. What ever power you're producing with that 1,000 ft. lbs. of torque I can produce with 100 ft. lbs. and more rpms. They will both move the truck the same.

Originally Posted by SneakyOwner
I honsetly don't understand this hp tq battle because there isn't one.
Oh, there is. Countless arguments about power this, but torque that. You're doing it yourself. You say you need tons of torque to move a truck. You don't.


Originally Posted by SneakyOwner
If you need to move a big load from a stop then you need alot of tq to get it moving.
You don't need that torque from the engine. If you have the power, you can create the torque you need with gearing. So, yah, technically you're right. You need some torque to move the truck. A lot of it. But the torque doesn't have to be created at the flywheel. It doesn't have to come from the engine. All the engine needs to do is produce the same amount of power (torque output can me minuscule) and you can gear it down to accelerate the truck.


Originally Posted by SneakyOwner
If you want a good drag car you need a good powerband and custom transmission in order to take advantage or the tq curve and and also take advantage of the high hp in order to get a high trap speed.
*sigh*
I'd love to untangle that one but I'd rather not right now.
2009-10-03 04:29:17
#36
I like to relate the HP/TQ to electrical power and voltage. Power and voltage are related, yes. But the same? No.

Power is VoltageXAmps=Watts (or horsepower). Think of Voltage as your rpm, and Amps as your torque.

You can have 8000volts from a static discharge, but it won't power the smallest of light bulbs. You can have 1000amps of energy, but without the electrical pressure from voltage, it won't happen without extremes in wire size lol.

So, for the record. HORSEPOWER IS WHAT MATTERS

IT is the direct relation of how much POWER the engine is producing. Whoever has the highest average hp over the curve, with the right gearing, will win. Every time.

A diesel truck can have 2000lb of torque, and weigh 2000lbs. But if it only has 1hp, it isn't going anywhere fast.

Rally cars have huge torque at the bottom end. And push a ton of boost. But they do this to generate a nice flat hp curve. HP is the direct relation of how much power the engine is making, and having a nice high avg hp curve will make for a fast car. The torque number is just generated to relate the power to rpm. That's it. As far as the speed of the car, it can be totally irrelevant.
2009-10-06 15:00:02
#37
If we are going by the power that the engine produces at the crank it is one thing. Yes Ben, using gearing as long as you do the math you should technically be able to find enough Tq. to move anything.
My truck example was merely to say if a truck weighs 2,000lbs I doubt if you hook up a sentra to that load it is going anywhere. Maybe if you changed the gearing to the lowest gearing possible then maybe it would work.
2009-10-06 23:09:48
#38
Originally Posted by SneakyOwner
If we are going by the power that the engine produces at the crank it is one thing. Yes Ben, using gearing as long as you do the math you should technically be able to find enough Tq. to move anything.
My truck example was merely to say if a truck weighs 2,000lbs I doubt if you hook up a sentra to that load it is going anywhere. Maybe if you changed the gearing to the lowest gearing possible then maybe it would work.


TQ isn't a movement. But a force causing movement. Once it starts moving, then work is being done. HP is a pure calculation of work being accomplished. True, gearing will allow for torque multiplication, but again this is a steady-state force on the wheels of the vehicle. Turns out gearing helps get the engine into its "powerband".

TQ cause of the movement. The movement is kinetic and can be expressed by work being completed. 550lbs moved 1 ft per second is 1hp. 10,000,000lbs moved 0 ft per second is still... 0hp. Regardless of how much force is applied to it.

basically, kinetic energy is measured as work being accomplished (in hp). Potential energy would be the torque applied.
2009-10-07 00:32:32
#39
Im a mechanical engineering major so I know the formulas. I was attempting to relate the concepts to what normal people could easily relate these forces too. My words didn't describe it well...fail
2009-10-07 06:31:54
#40
Thats like my buddies 97 Powerstroke. it makes 4XX ft lb torque.....but only 180-200hp to move that heavy truck across a distance.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top