Originally Posted by STRATTON
a cusco fstb is more then capable of stiffing up the front end.
look into them.
stratton.
a cusco fstb is more then capable of stiffing up the front end.
look into them.
stratton.
I beg to differ, when my FW triangulated bracing was loose, the difference was very noticeable. I thought something was broken, due to the "slop".
Coleman did it on the cheap, but it works very well esp anchored to the GC plates. He measured the deflection under load before and after, it was significantly less (how involves using a laser, mirror, don't ask...). It also being home-brewed cost a lot less than a Cusco, I am guessing. And yes, that is simply a box section piece of steel across the towers - 4 bolts and a piece of essentially "scrap" metal. Rectangular hollow metal box cross sections don't like to twist, although they are not very sexy compared to most FTSB's.
I added some metal behind the FW side mount, loctite to the threads, and it works very well. Even with Nittos, there are not too many B13's that can pull 0.96g's on a crappy skidpad. Mine can, thanks to Dave C:
Clearly several thousand $$$ in custom valved Progress CO's and corner-balancing plus a 33mm FWB and a Progress A-Arm/Lower Control Arm chassis brace helps, but I'm saying that triangle makes a BIG difference, too, because I've felt it w/o it.
SCCA seems to agree, because that bracing is 1 of 2 of the only reasons I cannot run STS class in AutoX, the other being the front brakes. It's a big jump from Street Touring to Street Prepared, too (DSP).
I guess it depends on what you mean by "enough"
Don't take my word for it, I love this quote, I couldn't say it any better:
"Even in the wet, this is a brilliant machine...with balance as close to Neutral as any front driver..." - Mike Kojima