![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
octotatfirst off this is a "design study" more for my personal amusment than public consumption.
Yes, a design study that I am particularly excited about. Other folks have discussed making these (Stephen and Truax), but no one has had a successful GB or still offers them for sale.
The Maxima guys, with the Truax peice, swear by them. No negative reviews, all positive feedback.
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
octotati think shawn got a little excited that someone might create another part to further his quest for the stiffest car ever.
Damn skippy sir.
I replaced my Active Tuning 2-point with a BIB 3-point RSTB. Which I love.
Still saving money for an O.E.M. (Overkill Engineering Motorsports) 3-point FSTB to replace my Cusco 2-point. Unless I had another 3-point FSTB option from another vendor....
If it stiffens our chassis, I want it and will plunk down my money. My vehicle is
night and day different from any other B13/14 that I have ever ridden in. Including mine before it's restoration.
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
octotati think we all can agree none of us have measured a b13 chassis dynamically on a racetrack for chassis flex.
so some think these will make a difference, some don't think they will.
Some of the folks that
think sub-frame connectors will help are you, Mike K., Stephen (of Stephens Fender Braces) and Truax.
Truax threads on our forum(s):
http://www.sr20-forum.com/general-sr20/1125-b13-chassis-braces.html
http://www.sr20-forum.com/group-buys/1160-truax-motorsports-b13-chassis-brace.html
http://www.sr20forum.com/general-sr20/220036-chassis-brace-update.html
TruaxMotorsports has thirty-six (36) threads on Maxima.org and plenty of them are SFC threads for the different generation Maxima's.
http://forums.maxima.org/index.php
The Maxima guys give SFC's
rave reviews. Nothing negative I could find.
Stephen's SFC thread:
http://www.sr20forum.com/suspension-chassis/217210-subframe-connectors.html
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
octotatbut the beauty of our "rails" is there is a little plug in the floor that when removed gives you access to the inside of them. by using a strap with nuts welded to it and slid up the rail... you now have secure mounting points.
Hmmmmm....I have no access to the inside of my frame rails. There is two-part catalytic foam in 8 lb density (U.S. Composites) filling my frame rails, cross rail under the seats, and front rails. Not to mention 2 lb density foam (HandiFoam) in my A-B-C pillars and the roof surround channel.
As far as I know, I would be thee only person with this issue. Perhaps there will be another way, maybe welding, that these bars (if produced) could be properly secured to my vehicle.
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
octotatnow i have more ideas to add a few more tabs for future upgrades but the concept needs to be felt out to this point before i continue.
thanks
-chuck
Sorry if I jumped the gun Chuck, you posted "over yonder" and I did not yet know you were "back here" again. I look at the Suspension Sections nearly every day for anything new, informative or interesting. This possible-product scored on two (2) of my criteria.
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
BenFennerI just assume the "bashing" take place during the planning stage and not afterward? No?
Constructive criticism and intelligent design analysis are always a good thing.
However, some folks were criticizing the preliminary design, quote
"these do little to nothing," and had not even bothered to read the entire thread(s). C'mon now....
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
BenFennerChuck, I didn't realize this was something you'd created for yourself and basically for yourself only. I wouldn't have said anything if it weren't presented as a possible product for sale.
Even if these were exclusively for Chuck and his vehicle, an intelligent engineering discussion is
always relevant.
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
BenFenner
Chuck, after reading your explanation I can only say I believe your attempts at stiffening the chassis in that way are superfluous. If you don't care to discuss it, that's fine.
As a total layman, with zero engineering expertise, I cannot understand why bracing the vehicle side to side,
front to back,
and crossways is not (pretty much) always a good thing (?).
![](/images/bbcode/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
octotat
???
i'm not sure what you want to discuss
i believe the b13 would benefit from longitudinal bracing, you don't.
without a way to confirm or contradict these beliefs, we must go on faith.
i have to go on the experience and expertise of the last 100 years of auto racing that says stronger/stiffer is better
thanks
-chuck
Call me a "Mike K Disciple" but if
he wants sub-frame connectors, that is about all I really need to hear. If it is a good idea from a guy that has an engineering degree, works primarily on race cars, and is continuously hired as a Suspension Consultant to professional race and drift teams.... Then I am following right along behind him like a baby duck imprinted on a surrogate mother, and copying everything he does (that I can afford).
Assuming I can mount these things, if they are produced, to my foamed frame rails....
Eagerly awaiting further developments and information, while saving my cash.
Shawn B