Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: RR sr20 dyno

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 11-19 of 19
2008-09-17 21:10:08
#11
Originally Posted by Vadim
Sweet

I'm highly thinking about it.



No dont get a RR, you know you dont like them, stay away from them,
2008-09-17 21:11:56
#12
Get some of those JWT RR cams and you will see 160 WHP.
2008-09-17 22:27:00
#13
Originally Posted by Andreas
Get some of those JWT RR cams and you will see 160 WHP.



Cams are here... Im going to install them and re-dyno next week
Let you know guys ..
Thanks.
2008-09-17 22:36:38
#14
Originally Posted by chiquae07
^^its said that it messes up the harmoics or something on a roller rocker since the crank is only 4cw. miko has stated that you can do pullies, it shouldnt make a difference. cant remember what thread it was in. this was wayyyyyy back.

thats some pretty good numbers too for that set up.


i would never run light pulleys on any sr! the crank balancer is heavy for a reason.....to balance! the only balancer i would ever upgrade to is a ross or similar item which are actually heavier than standard.

ac and alternator etc doesnt mater though, run whatever pulley you want there
2008-09-18 01:25:03
#15
hmm 146 whp w/ just bolt ons! me likey! now i just need to get some extra cash to buy an exhaust.
2008-09-19 00:37:28
#16
1 question guys . who over here have the OLD cam test done by the Sport compact magazine?
thanks.
2008-09-19 00:38:51
#17
Originally Posted by jpsr20det
1 question guys . who over here have the OLD cam test done by the Sport compact magazine?
thanks.


Why do you ask, I only say so because there was no RR comaprison in there.
2008-09-19 17:14:45
#18
I know Andreas

I ask becouse of another proyect Im thinking about.
thanks.
2008-09-19 18:34:50
#19
Check your mail JP.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top