Thread: Roller Rocker Virtual Dyno Testing

Awesome work! I'd love to see a CAI in there too

what program do you use for the vdyno?

nevermind:
http://www.sr20-forum.com/general-sr20/52613-regrounded-my-maf-virtual-dyno-numbers.html#post701999

:EDIT: This is a great tool! I've been entering some of my archived Consult logs and it seems pretty accurate to what I was getting on the dyno

So from this dyno, it is worth getting the SSAC if you get the 2.0" mid pipe with the stock redline.

Yes!!! Now most of my runs maxed out at 6600 rpm at max. Stock redline is around 6750, but ECU's start cutting fuel 150rpm before redline. Thus I raised my redline to be 6900 and will try to do a run today. This should be good until 6750 or so. If SSAC 2.5 makes more WHP it might be a good contender still. Otherwise 2.0 or maybe 2.25 is your best bet. Plus you are Auto so low end torque is what you really need .

15 hp at redline is awesome, i need to get my header on.

^I know right. Just put this back on the Christmas list. I wonder what it would be with S3R's and header.



So that butt dyno isn't what it use to be? Lol. Again, thanks for doing this bro.

Ah see that's a hard one to test. Dyno runs are done at WOT. Y I still feel like with stock RR header I have to press the gas less to get the same amount of torque then I did with a 2.5" SSAC. But I never tried 2.0" on my wife's car with stock ECU. The P11 I did the testing on I haven't driven enough (NA RR) to really notice a difference.

I want to say it's safe to assume that SSAC 2.0" is going to be as good as stock with tq response down low.

VS



Showdown results in first post!

nice work. now boost it and report back.

Considering if I want to go 6 speed first or boost first...