Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: think tank - vqman's N/A Big Cam SR23DE Build 92x86

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 11-20 of 193
2010-09-07 17:52:30
#11
There is such a thing as too much cam.
2010-09-07 19:08:47
#12
VQ, you're scaring me dude. You really think you can pull this off? "Custom cams"? "Suspect you could assemble it"?!?

Have you considered someone selling you a "turn-key" big-block motor? Professionally specified, built, assembled and tested on a stand. Then you and the local professional mechanic of choice just drop it in.
2010-09-07 19:22:03
#13
Are you drunk?
2010-09-08 01:07:11
#14
Originally Posted by BenFenner
There is such a thing as too much cam.


right, not looking for 360* duration here.. lol

so I'm thinking like an S3 or S4-like profile on the "low side" and a C3-like profile on the "high side"... I want lopey idle.. but I don't want to lose too much low end torque.

maybe something like:
low end of .455" LIFT / 263 DEG.DUR.
high end of .525" LIFT / 285 DEG. DUR.

you might say it's not worth having a VE head, but hey? why not? I want to build my dream SR. that's what this forum is all about, right?

Here's why I don't think I'd like C3 on DE head -> i would have really lopey idle like I want, but no low end...

Here's why I don't want standard fair VE -> if I went with standard N1 cams, I wouldn't have much of a lopey idle, but a decent top end.. but not a crazy awesome top end like the C3..

SR16VE N1 cams high lobe is only .472" LIFT / 288 DEG.DUR (.469" exh)

I'm not planning on putting a hair dryer on this to back up the cams. I want N/A goodness!!

Originally Posted by Shawn
..., you're scaring me dude. You really think you can pull this off? "Custom cams"? "Suspect you could assemble it"?!?

Have you considered someone selling you a "turn-key" big-block motor? Professionally specified, built, assembled and tested on a stand. Then you and the local professional mechanic of choice just drop it in.
Scaring you?? you should see me naked brah, you'd REALLY be scared!! (in a MAKE IT STOP sort of way..)

Why couldn't I assemble the parts? after the machine work is done, I can put the thing in my living room and take my time with it... I have friends locally that can help if I come across something I don't know how to do. A buddy of mine just got his VET running.. with SR16 (non N1) cams and a DE or DET block VE head.... GTiR manifold and t28 of some sort, maybe a GT28.. i dunno..

turning wrenches is the easy part.. knowing what parts work best for what I'm trying to do is the hard part....

I did work on Cobra's and Huey's for 5 years while in the Marines, and later I worked at TWA rewinding electric motors, generators, alternators, fuel pumps, etc... I can wrench.. I just don't know cars that well.. i know aviation electronics.. give me some credit...

Originally Posted by NeedsMoreCowbell
Are you drunk?
not at the moment, but I think I may have been when I typed the original post..





so can someone help me decifer these links?

Kelford 314 Camshafts for SR16VE or SR20VE - PartBox Online

Kelford Cams Applications

someone help a brother out

Kelford 184-C cams for SR20VE
Low lobe IN- ???? LIFT/ ???? DEG. DUR - Low lobe EXH - ???? LIFT/ ???? DEG.DUR
High Lobe IN - .492" (12.5mm) LIFT/ 314 DEG.DUR - High lobe EXH - .452" (11.5mm) LIFT/ 313 DEG.DUR
2010-09-08 01:18:58
#15
Originally Posted by ...
I want lopey idle.. but I don't want to lose too much low end torque.
Those things are kind of incompatible. You could use stock VE cams on the high lobes at idle (for the lopey idle) and then switch to the proper low cams right off idle to give you the good low end, then switch back to the high cams at the usual rpm...

2010-09-08 01:32:08
#16
Originally Posted by BenFenner
I'm gunna reply to this even though I see Miko has replied. I haven't read any of the replies yet, so I don't know what has been covered or not. Obviously if something I say contradicts Andreas, you should ignore what I say and go with Miko's info.
I've been talking to Dre via PM's.. he always wants me to call, but I retain data so much better when it's written, I do terribly with verbal communications.

Originally Posted by BenFenner
Just FYI on the S5 cams. JWT said they are a bad cam design and were only created for a specific racing league with specific cam restrictions. They do not recommend them to anyone not in that racing league.
ah, good to know!


Originally Posted by BenFenner

Yah I saw above where Miko corrected you on this. Square is about bore/stroke, not CC size or shape.
if you change the bore/stroke - don't you change teh CC size and shape?

Originally Posted by BenFenner

You could also just use a VE and run on the high cams all the time. Not sure if you'd have problems with oil pressure at idle not being high enough to engage the high cams though. Certainly there are race cams out there for the VE with "low" lobes only that are huge (no "high" lobes at all), and you could ditch the entire VVL system. It would be full race braw.
but I don't wanna run my high cams ALL the time.. I don't want to destroy the low end torque offered by less aggressive cams..

Originally Posted by BenFenner

Nope. I'm sure Miko covered this, but I'll say it too. Cranks (or crank stroke) have nothing to do with compression.

Not exactly no. Really, bore and stroke have nothing to do with compression ratio. That's up to the piston shape/size and the CC shape/size.

hmm.. I thought that if you push the cylinder into a larger bore cylinder the same distance (kept stroke the same) that you'd squeeze the air less. so to speak.. at least that is how it was explained to me. and if you had the same size bore and push the cylinder higher and closer to the head, you'd also compress the air more. Especially with a large crank that takes the piston deeper into the cylinder and allows more air to come in, then goes up even further than it used to.. crunching more air into even less space.. (blowing head gaskets all the while).. LoL

So this explanation I was given is wrong??

Originally Posted by BenFenner

No. Tuning takes time. That's all there is to it. It can take little time or lots of time. Doesn't really matter if you're N/A or boosted.
yeah it takes time, but something tells me, that all things being equal, tuning an N/A car takes less time than a turbo - only because there are less things to adjust. but then again, with turbo, you're probably more easily satisfied with less than perfect results because the boots adds so much damn power without perfection.. hmm... maybe that makes N/A tuning take so long.. you gotta be PERFECT... :\
2010-09-08 01:36:10
#17
Originally Posted by BenFenner
Those things are kind of incompatible. You could use stock VE cams on the high lobes at idle (for the lopey idle) and then switch to the proper low cams right off idle to give you the good low end, then switch back to the high cams at the usual rpm...



right right.. but an S4 cam has lopey idle and more low end grunt than a C5 cam you smart ass..

I have S3 cams now.. not lopey enough.. but if I go to 2.4L I will get back some low end torque by virtue of a larger displacement engine..

I want a large cam, powerful NA motor... but going with C3's really doesn't seem like a great daily driver..

so I am thinking a custom cam with S4 low side and C3-like high side..

I know it can be done with the right amount of money. The question is, would it work worth a damn ??
2010-09-08 01:42:48
#18
VQ instead of me replying to your questions, would you please look up compression ratio and how it relates (or doesn't) to bore and stroke? I know it sounds counter-intuitive, but they aren't terribly related. A little reading and a few diagrams is all you need. Try "How Stuff Works" first.
2010-09-08 01:44:00
#19
I can tune your car to give you a lopey idle with any cam
2010-09-08 01:47:03
#20
That's hilarious, and maybe the best solution to his unique request... =]
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top