Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Sr20De(rr) with SR16 piston

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 31-40 of 108
2010-08-25 16:47:27
#31
rr's came with a 4cwc.

stratton.
2010-08-25 16:51:41
#32
Naked time (shower) is the best for thinking about cars.

Thanks, stratton.
2010-08-25 16:58:54
#33
Originally Posted by Viprdude
High port heads don't flow as much as his engine would so his head would be worse than before if he put a high port on there.

did you really believe that ? i recommend to do some research on Japanese N/A SR20DE monsters, not a single one uses RR, i've test both and i can tell that in real conditions not some lab test high port is the better performer, it has the right angles and is built for power and torque not to meet some emission standards
( racing SR20's are with high port too with bigger combustion chamber like GTI-R )
2010-08-25 17:00:58
#34
Originally Posted by rnd2k
did you really believe that ? i recommend to do some research on Japanese N/A SR20DE monsters, not a single one uses RR, i've test both and i can tell that in real conditions not some lab test high port is the better performer, it has the right angles and is built for power and torque not to meet some emission standards
( racing SR20's are with high port too with bigger combustion chamber like GTI-R )


I believe Charles and his flow bench numbers. And why would a VVL engine be a low port?
2010-08-25 17:02:03
#35
Originally Posted by rnd2k
did you really believe that ? i recommend to do some research on Japanese N/A SR20DE monsters, not a single one uses RR, i've test both and i can tell that in real conditions not some lab test high port is the better performer, it has the right angles and is built for power and torque not to meet some emission standards
( racing SR20's are with high port too with bigger combustion chamber like GTI-R )


Timeline > you

I've made more power with RR than highport. More efficient flowing head = more power.... With your logic I should get rid of my VE and go to a highport to make more power. Let me do that.
2010-08-25 17:03:37
#36
Originally Posted by wnwright
With your logic I should get rid of my VE and go to a highport to make more power. Let me do that.


Exactly. Not happening.

Maybe he is upset because he has a high port?
2010-08-25 17:11:33
#37
Originally Posted by Viprdude
Maybe he is upset because he has a high port?


There was a local guy that tried to convince me high port made more power than lower port or rr.... He now has a RR in his car (my old car)... He won't use anything else now.
2010-08-25 17:16:11
#38
Originally Posted by Viprdude
Exactly. Not happening.

Maybe he is upset because he has a high port?


LOL i don't want to argue just tell you how the things are every one is free to drive what he prefer believe me i'm not upset i have both engines actually i have a unopened 150hp blacktop RR laying in the junk
i just want to help the guy to make strong car
and yes i can put a VE on shadow just line up
2010-08-25 17:24:22
#39
Originally Posted by rnd2k
and yes i can put a VE on shadow just line up


So you make over 200whp? Or are dynos and timeslips not "real" conditions also?
2010-08-25 18:37:56
#40
Originally Posted by Viprdude
LOL, I was in the shower thinking about that very thing. I am 75% sure they came with a 4 CW crank.


Originally Posted by vqman
I thought the RR came with 4CW crank... Hmmm so much to research.. Argh



Double yes on the 4 CWC
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top