Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: New Dyno Results: 157 whp and 128 torque

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 11-20 of 27
2010-06-18 12:11:24
#11
Originally Posted by Prodrifter
why do you see 7700rpms daily? Are you asking to blow the motor?

A redline (or 20) a day keeps the sludge away.
2010-06-18 14:03:03
#12
not SAE corrected!
if you can, post up the SAE numbers. you might have to go back to the dyno place and have them print it out for you. or, you could save the info to a thumb drive and print it yourself.
2010-06-18 15:19:55
#13
Originally Posted by Teal97
if you can, post up the SAE numbers. you might have to go back to the dyno place and have them print it out for you. or, you could save the info to a thumb drive and print it yourself.


SAE is 154.08 whp and 125.37 torque. I see some Dyno's on the list even with the CF either A) Not even listed or B) In STD. I see 5 of them in SAE corrected numbers.

I googled it and it seems pretty forward. STD is for people in higher elevation places.
2010-06-18 15:50:06
#14
ahhh thank you

and nice numbers again, look into some pullies and crack 160
2010-06-18 15:53:33
#15
Added the graphs to the top and the third graph is a comparison of the three highest I got from the three different times I have dyno'd my car.
2010-06-18 17:43:47
#16
there we go. i was gonna say earlier that the tq seemed a little on the low side. for ~ the same price, i'd invest ($150 or less) in some cam gears, before pullies, to try and get the tq back up. retard the exhaust cam in 2* increments. that oughta bring it back into the 130's.
other than that, the power looks to be holding on pretty good for a medium performance street cam. better than my jwt S3 cammed de did, back in the day.

jmho
2010-06-18 19:23:14
#17
If I could find a longer duration exhaust cam, that would also bring that torque back up. I am trying to find a 272* duration exhaust cam.

Retarding the exhaust cam gear would probably accomplish the same thing. I was expecting some more torque but I think that the cams kept it lower than normal but gave me nice top end HP.

Teal97, thanks for your humble opinion. Always appreciated.
2010-06-18 21:23:18
#18
nice numbers but thats why i recommened s4's.

bc's never make power like jwt cams.

either way im sure shes fun to drive.

7700 is fine on a de. dont listen to these people.

i ive been doing 7800 rpm for years and will do 8grand now with no worries (s4's and stock s&r).

stratton.
2010-06-18 21:53:48
#19
Thanks Stratton. A great bang for your buck cam indeed.

JWT programs the ECU to rev to 7750 for B13's and B14's all day. I am positive there is a reason they are still in business and have a very loyal fan base.

It took me six years to find out first hand how good there stuff is. I want to take her to 8000 so badly. I don't think JWT will re program any higher because of my stock valvetrain but I can always ask and hope.
2010-06-18 23:58:48
#20
Originally Posted by Viprdude
Thanks Stratton. A great bang for your buck cam indeed.

i don't think JWT will re program any higher because of my stock valvetrain but I can always ask and hope.


the 3rd time ($100 ea. time) i sent my ecu back to jwt for a reprogram (big cam program) i asked for "No Rev Limit". i told them i'd be controlling my rev limit with an msd digital 6. to my surprise they were ok with that. being able to take the S5's to ~8k (or higher) was like . it didn't last long though. 5k miles later my freight train pullin' de was dead. stock springs gave out and literally killed the motor @ only 3k rpm. but, that biatch was a blast while it lasted.
when i purchased the S5's they were touted as "the biggest cams available for the stock valve train". whatever you do, please think hard about uprated valve springs as a "cheap insurance policy".
good luck and have fun
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top