Thread: cam ??'s

+ Reply To Thread

First

Posts: 11-16 of 16

Search Thread

2009-12-03 22:29:37

#11

NissanGuy

Jimi

Join Date: 2007-12-12
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,087
Trader Score: 18 (100%)

even if u were to get the S4s that 2.25 exhaust is going to kill the power they would be making, i think u might be better off with a full set of pullies and/or the 5speed swap

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Lowport>Highport, haha
B14 95 SE-R DE <-Stolen
B14 97 SE-R VE
P10 95 A Work In Progress
[url]www.floridasr20s.com[/url]

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-12-03 22:49:56

#12

jer_760

Banned from Classifieds

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location: Arlington, Tx
Posts: 1,835
Trader Score: 4 (100%)

Originally Posted by NissanGuy

even if u were to get the S4s that 2.25 exhaust is going to kill the power they would be making, i think u might be better off with a full set of pullies and/or the 5speed swap

Funny you say that, I ran faster times with the pacesetter header and stock exhaust, then I did with the ssac and 2.5" exhaust. Both with S4's of course.

I dont have the timeslips, this was 5 years ago.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

95 200sx
sr20ve

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-12-03 22:53:06

#13

jer_760

Banned from Classifieds

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location: Arlington, Tx
Posts: 1,835
Trader Score: 4 (100%)

Originally Posted by MR-4Door-SR20DET

^Interesting you say this about the notice. How high could you rev with the auto ECU? I have some friends up north that have done a lot of testing on a auto SR20DE NX and the results seemed best with stock cams to keep the low end torque.

7100 IIRC with the stock b14 ecu, but I switched to an auto g20 ecu which moved it up to 7500. Dont get me wrong, I noticed a loss in low end, but it was not drastic, also the small exhaust probably helped a little.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

95 200sx
sr20ve

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-12-03 23:16:24

#14

speedkills Online/offline status of speedkills is unknown

Night RiderZ

Join Date: 2009-03-02
Location: SKC, Mo.
Posts: 75
Trader Score: 1 (100%)

well with my stock cams i can go to 8000 rpm, and yea the smaller exhaust will help with the low end torque (atleast on chevys). and i have a pulley set on the way, i'll be deleting the ac when i install them.

any guestament of what you ran? 14's, 15's, and please don't say it ran a 16

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

'89 Sentra w/ SR20DE swap---sold and missed

'92 Sentra SE-R 5speed--------Gonna rebuild into a track car
'93 Sentra SE-R auto------------DD
'92 Firebird Formula Stroker---Race Car, For Sale-$3,500
'87 Kawasaki 600R Ninja-------"Death Trap", For Sale-$1800
'99 Suburban---------------------transporter

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-12-03 23:39:28

#15

jer_760

Banned from Classifieds

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location: Arlington, Tx
Posts: 1,835
Trader Score: 4 (100%)

Originally Posted by speedkills

I only ran the 1/8th. My fastest time back then was a 9.2@72ish, I just dont remember if that was with the auto or manual. I know for a fact it wasnt slower than a 9.5-9.6.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

95 200sx
sr20ve

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-12-03 23:43:08

#16

speedkills Online/offline status of speedkills is unknown

Night RiderZ

Join Date: 2009-03-02
Location: SKC, Mo.
Posts: 75
Trader Score: 1 (100%)

ok thanks. that gives me an idea of what to expect atleast

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.