im thinking about testing this header out compared to the ssac i have now but the only thing i dont like is the way the 1st and 4th cyling piping is done. It looks the turns on the bottom towards the merge are tight. Anyone have any input on that
Join Date: 2009-03-03 Location: Boston Ma Posts: 3,152 Trader Score: 25 (100%)
Hey guys lets not for get we have a forum vendor currently trying to develop a header for us. "Mazworx" promised that they will give us the most gains for the dollar with their header. If anything you want to keep these guys around here.
0 Likes
Be the first to like this post.
Join SR20-FORUM LEGENDS Today! Show some love get your times entered amongst the best in.
Join Date: 2008-01-03 Location: Casa Grande, AZ Posts: 669 Trader Score: 2 (100%)
Originally Posted by Topdog781 Hey guys lets not for get we have a forum vendor currently trying to develop a header for us. "Mazworx" promised that they will give us the most gains for the dollar with their header. If anything you want to keep these guys around here.
Originally Posted by se-riousjdm Any input on that?
It could be better, but I wouldn't worry about it too much. It's not any tighter than the other bends, just 45 degrees more of it. My main worry would be the cross-fire merging. I have no idea why they did that.
Join Date: 2009-03-03 Location: Boston Ma Posts: 3,152 Trader Score: 25 (100%)
Originally Posted by se-riousjdm Here is what im talking about:
Any input on that?
Honestly I think they did that so that number 4 pipe does not bang the cross member Thats the only reason I can think of ,the pipe still looks like it ends up the same length.
0 Likes
Be the first to like this post.
Join SR20-FORUM LEGENDS Today! Show some love get your times entered amongst the best in.