No it wouldnt have, trap speed comes strictly from power. Not to mention even on the 149.2 mph pass, I wasted the first 2 1/2 seconds of the run bogging and babying it through 1st. A good full out pass it would have trapped around 155mph as the car was. Easily, no questions asked. You waste time, your trap speed will be lower. Only for an n/a car does the spinning off the line result in a higher trap speed.
I have already proven this with my own car when I had the 60 trim turbo setup. First passes i had the slick pressure way too high and spun pretty much all the way down the track and trapped 126-127, lowered the slick pressure and got better traction still spinning through 1st and 2nd but not 3rd and 4th and went 132mph, no changes to anything other than more traction and a better launch.
Only in the n/a field does that higher trap with spinning apply.
Trap speed is pure power. Ghettomax's car was making about 600whp and his 140-141 trap speed represented that. He had a 9.90 pass because he had full on great run. A 9 second pass at that low of a trap speed means great 60ft and no spinning.
Put it this way, on the pass against Jamie at the convention, had I had the 330 ft from the 2nd pass against the muscle car, my car could have easily gone 9.7-9.8 @153-155mph on that pass. Just going off the slips, my 330ft alone on the 2nd pass was right at 1/2 a second quicker than the pass against jamie