Thread: 2.0 VE dyno testing

+ Reply To Thread

First

Last

Posts: 171-180 of 182

Search Thread

2012-10-31 13:41:35

#171

Kyle

OEM Plus.

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location:
Posts: 11,903
Trader Score: 52 (100%)

Originally Posted by cory

You do realize that these were specced for a big 2.4 right...... not the 2.0.

The Hayward ITB's? What are you referring to?

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Datsun/Nissan Racing -- 1977 to 1985 Richard's SCCA/IMSA 510 and 200SX competition days!
....95 FN4 200SX SE-R, 93.5 AL0 G20, 92 AH3 Sentra SE-R, 95 DJ2 G20, 96 CG2 G20 06 CTS-V
Save the 54C, GTi-R, Pulsar RNN-14 Parts! Click here!

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-10-31 14:07:38

#172

cory

Member

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location:
Posts: 2,903
Trader Score: 4 (100%)

Yes, the itbs... also where are we supposed to fit 18in of intake runners. If you cant hit the first harmonic pulse aim for the second, right?

1 Like

SR20GTi-R likes this post.

2.0 218/153- 12.9@106
2.3 270/190- 11.6@116
2.4 285/210- 11.5@118
Retired...

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-10-31 15:35:03

#173

Kyle

OEM Plus.

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location:
Posts: 11,903
Trader Score: 52 (100%)

Hmm

I may have missed where a 14 inch intake runner was introduced but I certainly do not agree with that.

However, I can agree with this above picture from the early 80's. L20B four cylinder with 50mm Solex carbs, 14.2:1 compression ratio with a 9200 RPM limit. The L20B FIA head does not flow as much air as the SR series head is capable of. Kinsler, in fact, recommended the 50mm as the bare minimum for a high performance SR engine in the conversations he shared with my Dad. (This was talking about the 54C head after I sent pictures to Mr. Kinsler to pique his brain) To add to the confusion, my Dad did not have the benefit of a cross-flow head that we all do now.

Now, I understand I don't have money to build any of these fancy things but a page taken from the past can help learn from either mistakes or triumphs.

But, once again, what do I know? I don't own a fancy engine so how credible am I really?

EDIT: I am just presenting information. That is all.

Last edited by Kyle on 2012-10-31 at 15-49-27.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-10-31 15:57:52

#174

cory

Member

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location:
Posts: 2,903
Trader Score: 4 (100%)

Mr dudeman is saying anything under 15in is wrong.... if you read in his post above. I thought it said 1.5ft that's where I got the 18in. He actually said 1.25...

1 Like

Kyle likes this post.

2.0 218/153- 12.9@106
2.3 270/190- 11.6@116
2.4 285/210- 11.5@118
Retired...

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-10-31 16:01:11

#175

Kyle

OEM Plus.

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location:
Posts: 11,903
Trader Score: 52 (100%)

I don't even know how I missed comprehension of that. Thank you, @cory.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-10-31 17:16:44

#176

Dudeman258 Online/offline status of Dudeman258 is unknown

Member

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 1,595
Trader Score: 6 (100%)

Originally Posted by Kyle

Walker,

You have earned your ticket onto the crazy train which is headed up by some other neat members such as myself.

Regards,
Kyle

Why thank you Kyle

Walker

Last edited by Dudeman258 on 2012-10-31 at 17-51-42.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

1991 SE-R - SR20VE - I/H/E, N1's - 203whp On Dyno Dynamics
- Do It Old School -

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-10-31 17:33:59

#177

cory

Member

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location:
Posts: 2,903
Trader Score: 4 (100%)

Lol now its your engine theory that you've discovered. .. alrighty. And was it your brilliance that also realized and increase in volumetric efficiency will equal an increase in power.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

2.0 218/153- 12.9@106
2.3 270/190- 11.6@116
2.4 285/210- 11.5@118
Retired...

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-10-31 17:50:08

#178

Dudeman258 Online/offline status of Dudeman258 is unknown

Member

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 1,595
Trader Score: 6 (100%)

Originally Posted by cory

Lol now its your engine theory that you've discovered. .. alrighty. And was it your brilliance that also realized and increase in volumetric efficiency will equal an increase in power.

Ooo, we just got mean. That actually took longer then I expected. Still a bummer though.

And no, not "my" theory, the chief engineer for Honda f1 and Indy racing engines for 15yrs..sorry to offend you.

Regards,

Walker

Last edited by Dudeman258 on 2012-10-31 at 17-54-17.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

1991 SE-R - SR20VE - I/H/E, N1's - 203whp On Dyno Dynamics
- Do It Old School -

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-10-31 18:08:06

#179

cory

Member

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location:
Posts: 2,903
Trader Score: 4 (100%)

I see you edited that now... no offense taken. I thought it was offensive where you had called it "my theory "....

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

2.0 218/153- 12.9@106
2.3 270/190- 11.6@116
2.4 285/210- 11.5@118
Retired...

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-10-31 18:17:17

#180

KillerKrossover Online/offline status of KillerKrossover is unknown

9k rpm crew

Join Date: 2008-10-20
Location: Socal
Posts: 724
Trader Score: 5 (100%)

Originally Posted by Dudeman258

Originally Posted by cory
Lol now its your engine theory that you've discovered. .. alrighty. And was it your brilliance that also realized and increase in volumetric efficiency will equal an increase in power.

Ooo, we just got mean. That actually took longer then I expected. Still a bummer though.

And no, not "my" theory, the chief engineer for Honda f1 and Indy racing engines for 15yrs..sorry to offend you.

Regards,

Walker

LOL, you and Kyle are jokers. Bunch of bs'er with no first hand experiences to share.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Reply Reply With Quote

First

Last

+ Reply To Thread

Thread Information

There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
StubUserName