Originally Posted by BenFenner
You put it well Nate. I focus on rate of change of RPM, not boost. Which is exactly why it blows my mind that some folks don't like light flywheels on boosted cars "because boost doesn't build as fast".
You're telling me that the car accelerates too quickly to build as much boost as you did before, and that's somehow a problem?
You realize you just said the car accelerates faster, right? You caught that part coming out of your own mouth, yes?
You put it well Nate. I focus on rate of change of RPM, not boost. Which is exactly why it blows my mind that some folks don't like light flywheels on boosted cars "because boost doesn't build as fast".
You're telling me that the car accelerates too quickly to build as much boost as you did before, and that's somehow a problem?
You realize you just said the car accelerates faster, right? You caught that part coming out of your own mouth, yes?
I liked the light flywheel on 8cw crank, but didn't like having to slip the clutch more to launch the car, it did also make me loose traction a lot sooner and for longer time in first and second gear. Those two gears are the most important to me with the driving I do, so 4cw crank and stock flywheel it is.
Originally Posted by wnwright
FWIW on ALL of the SR motors I built... I only used a 4CW crank for this reason. Always had super light rotating assemblies.
FWIW on ALL of the SR motors I built... I only used a 4CW crank for this reason. Always had super light rotating assemblies.
I like lightweight too, though I will say my VE didn't like stock flywheel, 4cw crank, and gspec pulley past 7k rpm.