Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Lightweight vs stock flywheel; momentum

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 21-30 of 35
2011-04-01 12:46:18
#21
Originally Posted by Viprdude
Newton's Law #1

"an object in motion will stay in motion and an object at rest will stay at rest unless acted on by an unbalanced force"

Please close the thread.

Originally Posted by Viprdude
Sir Isaac Newton ended this thread a few hundred years ago.


No he did not :P

That law only means that the car wants to slow down, because of the friction :P.

That there is an unbalanced force is a given, but in what way does the weight of the FW affect the coasting characteristics :P
2011-04-01 12:47:34
#22
Inertia, period. That is law number 1.

Newton's 3 Laws of Motion

The flywheel moves, it wants to keep moving. More mass means more energy.

I don't even understand how you got into a discussion with another person in regards to this....
2011-04-01 13:28:21
#23
You're right, I stand corrected.

And no, I don't believe it either :P
2011-04-01 16:31:55
#24
Originally Posted by GT2871RBLUBIRD
The other side, lightweight flywheel = worse highway gas mileage, says since it has less inertia you have to compensate by pressing on the gas more.

i wonder by having the lighter flywheel if weather or not it not only requires more accelleration percentages to sustain the same ammount of intertia as a stock flywheel would have, if in return you would have to incorperate more throttle percentages opening up the throttle wider, using more gas. thus causing you to incorperate more thorttle percentages and more accelleration percentages over a stock setup to maintain speed.

IMO i say @#$% it and love the gains you see from a lightweight flywheel verses any negative you might be able to conjour up lol.

i believe most people would say that too, i love lightweight flywheels for the fast accelleration and the fast decellerations, on the highway with boost lightweight flywheel is just crazy.


I honestly enjoyed the light flywheel an my 6 puck clutch for one reason, no one could drive/steal my car . The acceleration was nice, and since I bought it expecting better MPG's as per what most people say, I was disappointed.

Gas Mileage:
It seemed to decrease it on the highway, back down to 27mpg from 30ish. I don't have any hard data because I was expecting the gas mileage to go up not down. But I installed more then one "big" part when I installed the flywheel.

Traction:
I had a ball bearing T25 that lost traction at 5k rpm before motor mounts. Solid prothanes solved that problem and I could put first gear to redline without loosing traction. After installing the 10lb Fidanza, it went back to loosing traction at 5k rpm.


Originally Posted by M0J0
And since MPG is best when cruising at a constant speed, the less energy you need to put into the rotating part of the car, the better MPG. Which means that the heavier flywheel will have a higher amount of inertia, and requires less energy to keep that momentum.


Since I reread bunch of threads this morning when posting the update, it finally really clicked why light flywheels do worse on highway. It's the whole not having enough momentum when going uphill, and faster engine deceleration/braking when you let go of the throttle or downhill.
2011-04-01 17:02:14
#25
I saw no drop in gas mileage going from stock to JWT flywheel and Im now back to stock...

the car is alot smoother with the stock flywheel back in now.
2011-04-01 17:18:44
#26
anyone buying a lightweight fw to save fuel...
is buying it for the WRONG reason
2011-04-13 01:23:09
#27
I'm not getting what the 4 pistons doing inertia/combustion wise, what would happen with no flywheel? I believe I can answer what would happen with a really, really huge flywheel.
2011-04-13 02:34:30
#28
Originally Posted by richardwbb
I'm not getting what the 4 pistons doing inertia/combustion wise, what would happen with no flywheel?


I dont understand the first half of your sentence.

With no flywheel, your car would not move, but the engine would be a bit more rev happy.
2011-04-13 06:58:28
#29
maybe helpful to you...


http://www.sr20-forum.com/drag-strip/24905-lightweight-heavy-flywheel.html
2011-04-13 20:47:09
#30
I had a 11lb JGY flywheel in my 94 se-r with an sr20det, the decel was much quicker compared to my 92 se-r w/ the stock clutch and flywheel....plus when boost kicked in, it was pretty violent.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top