Originally Posted by
unijabnx2000 I like the rear engine rwd idea, moving it all as one unit to the rear (to me) keeps things simpler.
Its definitely the way Id do it if I had the funds.
I know a guy local to me (his build is on one of the honda forums) that rear engine/rwd swapped his Del sol with a K20.
Its pretty badass. Its around high 400whp, has run 7.00 in the 1/8.
It does keep it simpler, but taking all that weight off the front could make it handle squirrely. You basically have a completely empty engine bay up front, no weight on the front wheels, especially while accelerating. I'd be worried about the front end lifting at higher speeds.
Originally Posted by
Mattick22 Our engines actually sit in front of the front axle which probably contributes to some of our handling challenges.
All FWD cars will have this problem. You're front heavy and you have the front wheels dealing with acceleration, turning, and weight. Front engine, RWD cars have the best possibility of getting a 50/50 weight distribution, because most of the weight is between the wheels, and certain items, like the battery can go in the trunk.
Originally Posted by
se200 I remember when you went to UCF and killed your ve and swapped to the 3.5. If you want to do something first then stay with the 3.5l and collect all the awd parts from overseas. An AWD b14 se-l 3.5l would be way cooler. The parts are out there to make this happen, if I had more time I would be doing it but with I'm booked so I have to stick to my vet 6spd setup for now.
AWD is the most feasible setup, because the engine would most likely remain mounted the way it is. Finding M/T AWD parts is the issue, if they even exist. The only AWD 3.5s that I know of (like the Murano) are only available in Automatic or CVT. Trucks, like the pathfinder and Frontier are 4WD, which is not optimal.
Also, I'm not necessarily interested in pure traction, I just want it to be ridiculous. When the front wheels spin, you're just making heat. When the back wheels spin, you're having fun.