Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: If you could make your own intake manifold

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 131-140 of 202
2012-01-14 00:37:39
#131


2012-02-03 14:58:00
#132
Originally Posted by STRATTON
thats nice striker.

looks very well made. this is for an ve or de ? turbo ?

quality looks top notch.

mine looks so similiar to yours as far as design goes, the quality of yours looks top notch. the only difference i see just at a glanse by looking at yours is how low your injs sit.

what size tb will be your running ?


any thing made by hypertune is designed very well

perfect injector placement
u want your injectors placed as close to the cylinder head ports as u can get it
u want the injectors to be spray fuel directly into the intake port so its aiming at the back of the intake valve ( u wont want the injectors to be spraying into the runner walls )
u want the inlet of the plenum camber ( throttle body ) to flow air into the tops of trumpets NOT THE SIDE OF THEM

i remember seeing a picture posted on here where the member had a custom inlet manifold made and he had the trumpets sticking up so far into the plenum camber that the inlet was flowing air into the sides of the trumpets
very very bad design
2012-02-03 15:10:39
#133
Originally Posted by STR8E180
any thing made by hypertune is designed very well

perfect injector placement
u want your injectors placed as close to the cylinder head ports as u can get it
u want the injectors to be spray fuel directly into the intake port so its aiming at the back of the intake valve ( u wont want the injectors to be spraying into the runner walls )
u want the inlet of the plenum camber ( throttle body ) to flow air into the tops of trumpets NOT THE SIDE OF THEM

i remember seeing a picture posted on here where the member had a custom inlet manifold made and he had the trumpets sticking up so far into the plenum camber that the inlet was flowing air into the sides of the trumpets
very very bad design


That design is the only way to achieve proper length to make power for an NA application.
That design made 6whp over a flush stack manifold that was 2-1/2 inches shorter.
Making close to 14whp over stock on a stock VE is huge in my book.

With the space in the FWD chassis there is nothing else you can do for a plenum based manifold. Not to mention not even having enough room for a large enough TB.
2012-02-03 15:15:03
#134
Having small engine bays suck. Its really one of the biggest downfalls of our chassis.
2012-02-03 15:19:11
#135
i would much rather lose length in runner and gain better flow into the tops of the trumpets

in a rear wheel drive setup its the same

this is the clearance issues i had




2012-02-03 15:23:22
#136
Originally Posted by STR8E180
i would much rather lose length in runner and gain better flow into the tops of the trumpets


And make dog shit for power.

Been there and proved this already.
2012-02-03 15:23:34
#137
Jamie has tried both, the longer runner made more power. Same trumpets from what he said, one being flush on the bottom of the plenum 2 1/2" shorter runner lengths and the other 2 1/2" longer sticking into upper part of the plenum. In an N/A application, not turbo, it made more power with the longer runner.

N/A and turbo runners and designs are by far two different ball games. Smoother flow into the stacks is better for turbo by far than protruding stacks. N/A, getting proper runner length is more important. Perfect would be proper runner lengths with a good flow into the stacks. But its very hard to do on our fwd chassis.
2012-02-03 17:29:37
#138
2012-02-06 03:46:31
#139
update: Yes there's endcaps on it...no copying.

2012-02-06 03:56:07
#140
Going to try and center mount your TB?
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top